Posted on 12/04/2019 7:13:37 AM PST by pulaskibush
Judiciary Hearing on Constitutional Framework for Impeachment. The House Judiciary Committee held a hearing with legal experts to discuss the constitutional framework for potentially drawing up articles of impeachment against President Trump.
FAcebook livestream CSPAN facebook
Conservative Breitbart livestream with likely better comments
She could not have read it all in the time given. I think some of these profs had a heads up a while back.
I love it when they accuse him of “demanding”, when he did no such thing, and what he asked for was not done.
Whenever leftists use the word, “demand”, to describe the requests made by R’s, they are projecting.
I give her credit for having enough self control to leave her pussy hat at home.
Simple questions for all three:
Do you have any first-hand knowledge of any of the wrongdoing about which you’ve just articulated your views?
No? Then of what value is your testimony here if the facts are not as the Democrats have claimed them to be?
Each Republican, when called on should shout for his or her five minutes, over and over....”You LOST, Get Over It”. Then laugh uncontrollably. TDS is a wonderful thing!
Turley is a democrat but he is fair and loves the Constitution.
They add "for his personal gain" to the call transcript to make their case which clearly there has been no factual evidence of that, only feelings, presumptions, and opinions.
What ??? No reference to Scottish law?
Just wait until Maxine has her Hearings ,LOL
3rd witness is quite inept!
She is a biased extremist dedicated liberal political activist. Not at all an “objective” source.
So.. she talks about the Russians interfering in the 2016 elections and makes no mention of who the President was at the time, what they knew and how they handled the information.
This a an embarrassment to the country. The swamp is trying to cover their asses and realize how close Trump is to exposing their criminal activities. We the people need to stand up and support this administration and provide them the strength to continue the fight. Otherwise.... we are done.
They add “for his personal gain” to the call transcript to make their case which clearly there has been no factual evidence of that, only feelings, presumptions, and opinions.
Probably the personally tested buzz word.
Is there not a law that allows Ukranian corruption to be investigated?
Did the Congress not pass this law?
Is not Trump’s inquiry about possible Ukrainian corruption then his act of faithfully executing and upholding the nation’s laws?
VERY well put!!!!!
Ping for later.
So.. she talks about the Russians interfering in the 2016 elections and makes no mention of who the President was at the time, what they knew and how they handled the information.
Agree, and the fact that the Dems used the Ukrainians to go after Trump.
They are trying to reintroduce the Mueller conspiracy theory.
Even Schiff made a quick reference to this in an on air interview. i.e. The Russians did it
For me, this is like listening to scientists with grants at stake claiming that if we don’t adapt the green new deal, we’re all going to die in 12 years.
i.e. it is nothing but noise.
These people are like sportscasters and weather forecasters.
They have an opinion, that often is wrong but they are deemed to really know what the rest of us should believe.
What she read was the MSM false narrative. No less, no more.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.