Let’s keep this FReepathon moving and wrap it up, Folks!
Posted on 11/25/2019 9:17:05 AM PST by jazusamo
The descent of Fox News legal analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano into foolishness continues with a series of TV appearances in which the former New York Superior Court judge adopts the Adam Schiff interpretation of the Constitution where you are not allowed to confront your accuser, where being a fact witness does not require you to recuse yourself from running a kangaroo court impeachment inquiry, and where hearsay and presumption determine you are guilty until proven innocent.
In the face of public hearings in which Schiff unloaded his clown car of hearsay witnesses who made every presumption about President Trump except for the presumption of innocence, Napolitano warmly embraced Schiff’s fables, telling Reason’s Nick Gillespie that there is more than enough, and he uses the word very loosely, "evidence" to justify three or four articles of impeachment against President Trump:
In an interview with Reason’s Nick Gillespie on Friday, Fox News analyst Andrew Napolitano said there was “overwhelming” evidence of impeachable actions by President Donald Trump.
Napolitano said, “The Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee have unearthed enough evidence, in my opinion, to justify about three or four articles of impeachment against the president. We have to start this conversation by underscoring the fact that impeachment is not legal, it is political. Its only Constitutional base is treason, bribery, or other hard crimes and misdemeanors.”
He continued, “Here’s what I think the Democrats will want, Nick. Here’s what I think they will advance. One is bribery. The technical definition of bribery is the failure to perform an official duty until a thing of value comes your way, and they will argue that the president’s failure to disperse [sic] funds that the Congress ordered be dispersed [sic] until the recipient of the funds agreed to investigate a potential political opponent is an...
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Nappy has gone INSANE!!
Judge Andrew Napolitano, pant-load.
what the hell happened to this guy?
Did they find movies of him molesting little boys?
Fox News is putting a so-called “legal analyst” on when he is, in fact, nothing more than a propagandist. He belongs on the gong show.
Faggot.
In the words of Forrest Gump - Stupid is as stupid does.
Why Judge Napolitano (Lt. Dan) you ain’t got no brains (legs)!
Apparently fudge packing causes brain damage.
They must be blackmailing him about something.
He is trying to get attention, so the liberal media will love him.
Occam’s razor says, “Yes!”
“what the hell happened to this guy?”
It’s my understanding he interviewed with the Prez for AG and/or the Supremes and was turned down.
Judge, Anthony Napolitano is simply a full blown “Butt Wipe”!!! FNC/FBN should dump him this very minute!!! He is certified garbage bin material or, toilet flush refuse!!! Case closed!!! FOX...Broom him today!!!
Let’s keep this FReepathon moving and wrap it up, Folks!
“Nappy has gone INSANE!!”
Corporations go through management changes from time to time. Fox is going through a management change Murdoch’s sons. When change occurs, employees have a decision to make — adapt to the new regime or ultimate be replaced with someone who will be part of the new team.
He has chosen.
That man impersonating slime mold is a godsend.
We’ve now got:
1: You’re a Schiff-ty b*stard.
2. You’re full of Schiff.
3. That’s a pretty Schiffy deal.
4. You’re Schiffing me.
5. Darn, my dog just Schiffed on the floor.
6. That new employee is a studies major and doesn’t know Schiff.
ad infinitum.
A prostitute
So then if it is based in the Constitution, then it is a legal process, Judge Monekyface.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.