/https://public-media.si-cdn.com/filer/b6/11/b611d42c-35bb-4aec-a220-34c4a6ec7afe/nasm-si-98-15068.jpg)
Well these ####s are saying that what he did CAN be an impeachable offense so why the #### would I read the rest of it or care what they have to say?
There’s no need for a defense against NOTHING.
KILL IT in the senate and if they kick him out it’s war and a whole lot of horrible things happen to both sides.
It’s pretty ####ing simple, if terrible.
This is all about running the 2020 campaign out of the HOR on the taxpayer’s dime.
A feverish attempt to damage the president as much as possible for their weak field.
Bump for later read
There needs to be an investigation into the Democrat Party to see if any of them has ties to America.
You cannot change the article titles.
Not enough 'if proven's.
Here, I'll help:
If proven, the fact is that, if proven, a quid pro quo to, if proven, force the investigation, if proven, of a political rival, if proven, in exchange for military aid can, if proven, be impeachable, if proven.
They leave out the little fact that the political rival was extorting the other country with our money.
If the political rival was bragging about being engaged in a crime. Shouldn't the president look into it? political rival or not ?
If that's true then the House,alone,decides who's impeached and who isn't.
When you base your whole article on a lie, you have all ready lost the debate.
Here is the problem for the Democrat Fascists and their toadies in the Fake New Media.
We will let them assume EVERYTHING is true and accurate in the “transcripts. We allow this nonsense of hearsay, feeling and assumptions to be allowed as “evidence”.
There is still no crime here.
If “Quid Pro Quo” or “bibery” or what ever they are lyinging call it today is a “Crime”, Joe Biden is guilty of one while VP.
Watch the video of him bragging about it.
The President would have a legal obligation to investigate this “crime” So if it is a crime, Trump was doing his duty, it is is NOT a crime what Biden did it would still need to be investigated to verify. In either case Trump is not guilty of anything.
It is either a crime or it is not. It cannot be a crime for Trump but not for Biden. If it is a crime, Trump is legally obligated to help investigate Bidens actions. .
Either way there is no legal standing to this continuing farce in the US House.
Schiff does not know who the whistleblower is but vouches for his integrity. Hardy har har.
I think this guy is missing the fact that even if there was a quid-pro-quo to investigate biden, it does not automatically follow that it was for the purpose of finding dirt on an opponent. There is more then enough evidence that biden and his son are dirty and Trump has an obligation to get to the bottom of it. In a multi beneficial effort that is both good for America and good for Trump’s re-election, you can not automatically assume Trump’s intent. AKA plausible deniability. The dems are benefiting from the impeachment inquiry by dirtying-up Trump, yet no one is claiming it is to gain a political advantage. And we all know that is the motivation of the dems in going after Trump. It really pisses me off the the repubs and msm are giving the benefit of the doubt to the dems, but not Trump,
They are building a giant self detonating HMS Hood type of exploding case which will leave them destroyed and destitute!!
Today makes you think if AOC is really the Dumb one ,LOL
In the Senate where the actual trial would be held the “heard it from him, who heard it from him, or I felt like this meant that” shouldn’t be valid testimony.
Looking forward to your lawful execution for sedition and treason as an accessory after the fact, Turley.
bump
It already collapsed today, for EVERYONE to see..the only ones giving it any credence are the Never Trumpers and of course CNN and MSNBC..the whole impeachment nonsense died today..my 3rd cousins best friends sisters husbands dog heard SOMETHING..if this case were against Obama the media would laugh Republicans out of the country
