[[but he, with his superior intellect and insight]]
Read between the lines, and decoded the ‘true’ meaning of “NO QUID PRO QUO” to mean “Definitely quid pro quo” and all the liberals in ll la land smiled in glee-
This is all based on subjective interpretation- the fact of the case is there was no quid pro quo- the released call proves it
The democrats are trying to make the false claim that there doesn’t need to be pro quo- only quid- in order for it to be an ‘abuse of power’ and this is nonsense- they know it- all they are hoping for is to get enough rinos to side with them to impeach trump over nothing-
Dang teenagers today. They think no means yes. :)
Well duh! When we say we didn't do sumpn it means we did. When we say they did x it means we did x.
So it is just logical that when Trump denies something he admits it and when he says someone else did something it means he is the one who is projecting - you know like when he accuses Antifa of bashing heads it means that fascist Nazi Trump is out bashing heads - which we all know he is doing.
See. That's logic and we dims has a whole lot more smarts than you gun hugging deplorables.
If Quid Pro Quo is a Crime Joe Biden is guilty of one while VP. Watch the video of him bragging about it.
The President would have a legal obligation to investigate this crime So if it is a crime, Trump was doing his duty, it is is NOT a crime what Biden did, neither is Trump guilty of anything.
It is either a crime or it is not. It cannot be a crime for Trump but not for Biden. If it is a crime, Trump is legally obligated to help investigate Bidens actions.
Either way there is no legal standing to this continuing farce in the US House