[tbw2]

This would be totally illegal. It would be a violation of free speech rights AND election interference.

[kiryandil]

This is how the Left plans to negate Trump’s YUGE money advantage.

[dp0622]

Well dems are right now conducting super double secret meeting with those who they want to use to destroy Trump with.

After the whole mueller thing.

So illegal isn’t a problem with them.

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

This would be totally illegal. It would be a violation of free speech rights AND election interference.

Sometimes judges are unpredictable.

Representative Tulsi Gabbard (D-Haw.) recently sued Google for temporarily suspending her campaign’s Google Ads account after her appearance in last month’s Democratic presidential debate, when she was one of Google’s most-searched candidates....In response, Google spokesperson Riva Sciuto stated that Google “offers” its advertising services to campaigns “without bias toward any party or political ideology.” She said one of Google’s automated systems “triggered a suspension” of Ms. Gabbard’s account but did not provide a specific reason for the suspension or exclude the possibility that human agency was involved.

[Dave W]

Private companies can censure and ban all they want to. Free speech per the Constitution involves only government.

[outofsalt]

"This would be totally illegal. It would be a violation of free speech rights AND election interference."

If face book can't run adds no-one should run adds. NO-ONE