Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TULSI GABBARD SPARS WITH UFC CHAMP WEILI ZHANG
TMZ Sports ^ | Oct 21 2019 | TMZ sports

Posted on 10/21/2019 9:59:37 PM PDT by rintintin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: rintintin

Because she’s not THEIR rabid Democrat.


21 posted on 10/21/2019 10:57:31 PM PDT by Dapper 26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rintintin

She went against the Hildabeast.


22 posted on 10/21/2019 10:58:50 PM PDT by Freedom56v2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rintintin

When is she going to wake the frack up?

Getting tired of her bull$hit...

Dems hate military...they hate her...she’s never getting anything of value in dnc...

But she’s just such a $tupid bitch!

Keep having on military Tulsi...we so love that .....WE DON’T LOVE THAT...FYI


23 posted on 10/21/2019 10:58:53 PM PDT by pacificus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dapper 26

Because she’s not THEIR rabid Democrat.

I don’t know what that means. out of 12 or 13 Dem presidential candidates, she’s the only one the Dem establishment and the mainstream media HATE. They can live with any of the others, but they DESPISE Tulsi.

Same with the NeverTrumpers. They’re all ok with any of the Dem candidates - except Tulsi. I know this because I read their twitter feeds.


24 posted on 10/21/2019 10:59:43 PM PDT by rintintin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rintintin

Tulsi has taken some shots from Hillary’s camp that she took exception. She’s striking back at Hillary and that camp of the Democrat Party.


25 posted on 10/21/2019 11:01:30 PM PDT by Dapper 26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
This Specialist 6 salutes the Major for her service. Biden and Warren never risked their lives for the country.

God bless Ms. Gabbard for her service and I suppose we would all be better off if the Democratic Party were just a tad bit more sane.

26 posted on 10/21/2019 11:12:36 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rintintin

RULES, Gentlemen!

When it comes to Tulsi Gabbard, TTIWWP.


27 posted on 10/21/2019 11:19:01 PM PDT by Natty Bumppo@frontier.net (We are the dangerous ones, who stand between all we love and a more dangerous world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Agreed


28 posted on 10/21/2019 11:37:09 PM PDT by dp0622 (Radicals, racists Don't point fingers at me I'm a small town white boy Just tryin' to make ends meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

Whose his Tulsi. She’s a Nat. Gd troop. So what many of us have many tours in the combat theater. So this kicking demo is proving what? That’s she capable of kicking who, deplorables? Wow...


29 posted on 10/21/2019 11:43:18 PM PDT by OKITRUMP77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rintintin

What I find alarming is the Globalist right giving this woman yous.

They are trying to divide us. She is a Globalist, gun grabber, global warming nutjob. CFR.

They are trying to take Independents out of the Trump camp.

Just stop.


30 posted on 10/21/2019 11:44:22 PM PDT by WWG1WWA ("Brothers, what we do in life echoes in eternity." - Marcus Aurelius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WWG1WWA

Podesta behind candidate Tulsi Gabbard’s win:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3788050/posts


31 posted on 10/21/2019 11:52:56 PM PDT by WWG1WWA ("Brothers, what we do in life echoes in eternity." - Marcus Aurelius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Dapper 26

I have no problem whatsoever with her military service. It appears to be commendable and honorable. I object to her not being an Article II, Section one, clause 5 natural born citizen who is constitutionally qualified to assume the office of POTUS.

Tulsi Gabbard was born on April 12, 1981, in Leloaloa, Maoputasi County, on American Samoa’s main island of Tutuila.

Because of Obama’s 8 years, we cannot get the SCOTUS to adjudicate this Article III matter for the first time in US history.

Tuaua v. United States
According to the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), the people born in American Samoa – including those born on Swains Island – are “nationals but not citizens of the United States at birth”. If a child is born on any of these islands to any U.S. citizen, then that child is considered a national and a citizen of the United States at birth. In an amicus curiae brief filed in federal court, Samoan Congressman Faleomavaega supported the legal interpretation that the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not extend birthright citizenship to United States nationals born in unincorporated territories.

All U.S. nationals have statutory rights to reside in the United States (i.e., the 50 states and Puerto Rico), and may apply for citizenship by naturalization after three months of residency by passing a test in English and civics, and by taking an oath of allegiance to the United States. However, the INA makes clear that any “national but not a citizen of the United States” who at any time has been convicted of any aggravated felony, whether the aggravated felony was committed inside or outside the United States, is “debarred from becoming a citizen of the United States”

Gabbard is a US citizen (not a US Natural born citizen) by virtue of a statute, the Immigration and Naturalization Act, passed in the 20th century, which did not modify the intent of Article II, section one, clause 5, ratified in 1787. A statute cannot amend the meaning or intent of a constitutional provision.

Being a “Citizen at Birth” is not analagous to being a “Natural Born Citizen.” They are not the same thing. Puerto Ricans born in Puerto Rico are citizens at birth also. None of them are Article II Natural born citizens either.


32 posted on 10/22/2019 12:18:25 AM PDT by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rintintin

Why do people go nuts over her? I don’t get it.

33 posted on 10/22/2019 12:25:17 AM PDT by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rintintin

She’s not a medic.


34 posted on 10/22/2019 12:34:28 AM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rintintin
And in her corner.


35 posted on 10/22/2019 12:35:18 AM PDT by McGruff (Mitt Romney and Hillary Clinton should run together on the Sore Loserman Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WVNan
I've feared Gabbard - good looking, female, articulate, military vet, slightly more centrist - more than any of the Dem idiots, and a have a creepy feeling that these recent efforts to label her a Russian tool are a back-door way of garnering sympathy for her and making her seem like the sane alternative to Democratic madness.

Now that she is suddenly doing something "cool" and Superwomanly like sparring with a professional boxer, that impression is reinforced.
36 posted on 10/22/2019 12:45:01 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dapper 26

At least someone else understands she is NOT a “combat vet” and is just another socialist. As you said, insulting the CNC is a violation of the USMCJ. “Code of Military Justice Article 88 - Contempt Toward Public Officials states: “Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”


37 posted on 10/22/2019 12:50:51 AM PDT by pacific_waters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rintintin

She wasn’t a medic.


38 posted on 10/22/2019 12:51:42 AM PDT by pacific_waters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dapper 26

REMF?

‘Splain, please.


39 posted on 10/22/2019 1:17:28 AM PDT by Does so (.Democrats only believe in democracy when they win the election...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Does so
Rear echelon mtha fka.


40 posted on 10/22/2019 2:50:24 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson