Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canada Election Thread (Live)
CBC ^ | 10/21/2019 | CBC News

Posted on 10/21/2019 3:35:11 PM PDT by goldstategop

Polls just closed in Atlantic Canada. Post results here.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbc.ca ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Canada; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: blackface; bloc; brownface; canada; canadaelection; cbc; generalelection; greens; houseofcommons; jussie; liberals; livecanadaelection; ndp; ridings; tories; trudeau
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-336 next last
To: Sam Gamgee

True, but where you have entire provinces voting entirely for one party, it makes for an untenable situation.


281 posted on 10/21/2019 8:29:59 PM PDT by mrs9x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17; All
I have no idea how voting and politics works in Canada. Here's a tweet from Michelle Malkin:

Jussie Trudeau is now a real minority — and he doesn’t have to wear blackface! https://t.co/u7Zkx1J8Jd— Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) October 22, 2019


282 posted on 10/21/2019 8:32:45 PM PDT by Syncro (Facts is Facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: mrs9x

I agree. It’s time for Trump to offer a lifeline to the conservative provinces and see if he can’t make a deal to bring them into the US. It won’t happen of course, but the response might change the trajectory in Canada.


283 posted on 10/21/2019 8:35:09 PM PDT by binreadin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: binreadin

Can a province call for a referendum on secession?


284 posted on 10/21/2019 8:44:43 PM PDT by mrs9x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: mrs9x

Yes


285 posted on 10/21/2019 8:49:47 PM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: Bulwyf

Is a secession vote a referendum (legally binding) or a plebiscite (not binding)?


286 posted on 10/21/2019 8:52:02 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Do we know who won yet eh?


287 posted on 10/21/2019 8:52:35 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheehan

Mass immigration will also make the Dems the permanent majority party within a decade.


288 posted on 10/21/2019 8:59:47 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop; All

Liberals are behind in the popular vote by 1.5 million. If it remains the same anyone want to bet no one makes a big deal about it?


289 posted on 10/21/2019 9:03:53 PM PDT by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17

A law written up in 99 would make it legally binding.

It would not matter though. Ottawa can’t afford to let us go. They would appeal to the UN, it would get ugly. There’s no way they will let their bread basket go.


290 posted on 10/21/2019 9:05:17 PM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: steve86

Beautiful areas, and quite conservative, but many leave the lower mainland and bring their liberal views.


291 posted on 10/21/2019 9:06:28 PM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: Bulwyf

But... democracy... Right?


292 posted on 10/21/2019 9:08:18 PM PDT by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: wiseprince

Alberta and Saskatchewan should call a referendum ASAP. Time to get out.


293 posted on 10/21/2019 9:11:12 PM PDT by mrs9x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: wiseprince

Democracy is mob rule and mob rule is not freedom.


294 posted on 10/21/2019 9:13:16 PM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee

A few news sites are showing ridings already. So far, the only consolation I’ve been able to find is that the conservatives have knocked the liberals out of some more ridings in Ontario. But, unfortunately, nearly all of them are rural or suburban. Not the heavily-populated urban ridings that *REALLY* matter. :(


295 posted on 10/21/2019 9:16:24 PM PDT by Kriggerel ("All great truths are hard and bitter, but lies... are sweeter than wild honey" (Ragnar Redbeard))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

Comment #296 Removed by Moderator

To: Bulwyf

Canada isn’t a democracy. Its a Federal Parliamentary Constitutional Monarchy.


297 posted on 10/21/2019 9:24:43 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus

Justin Trudeau still on his throne but Liberals to return to Parliament with a minority government....so Trudeau doesn’t get what he wants when he wants.


298 posted on 10/21/2019 10:15:52 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: Bulwyf
A law written up in 99 would make it legally binding.

It would not matter though. Ottawa can’t afford to let us go. They would appeal to the UN, it would get ugly. There’s no way they will let their bread basket go.

I am not sure what weight the UN will have on the issue.

The Canadian situation reminds me of the secession of Southern US states from the United States of America in 1860-1861. Economic interests between the North and South caused the US Civil War. The Northern economy would be at a great disadvantage without Southern exports of cotton, sugar, etc., that had made up the great bulk of US exports that allowed the US to import a similar value of imports. The North was treating the South as though it was a colony from which to extract wealth. Something similar appears to be going on in Canada between the eastern and western provinces.

A majority of the 13 original states had said in their documents ratifying the US Constitution in the 1787-91s that they could either resume/reassume their own governance or they proposed 10th Amendment-like statements that meant the same thing. The Tenth Amendment was later ratified in 1791 and became part of the US Constitution. The Republicans in the Northern states in March 1861 passed a new tariff on imported goods that was much higher than what the seceded Confederate States had just passed for their own tariff on imported goods (which was similar to the previous US tariff). The new northern tariff immediately started reducing the number and value of goods imported to the North port cities causing many import businesses in Northern ports to close and Northern tariff revenue to decrease at a time when the US government was in a serious bind for revenue. Federal expenditures had increased substantially in the few years before the war.

Lincoln worried to others about where the money would come to run his government (tariffs being how the government financed itself at the time). Northern newspapers called for the blockade of Southern ports to stop the Southern ports from taking a big share of US imports which had previously been warehoused in Northern ports until they were sold to purchasers throughout the states.

Lincoln did not have the power under the Constitution to stop secession or blockade the Southern ports. But he assumed that power by provoking war with the South by sending a war fleet to Charleston with instructions to force their way into South Carolina waters if necessary. This he did ostensibly (i.e., for public consumption) to provide food to the US soldiers in Fort Sumter. He did this in spite of promises to South Carolina to withdraw the US soldiers from Fort Sumter and in spite of the fact that the Confederates had made food available to Fort Sumter from the Charleston markets until word came that the US fleet was coming to force their way into the fort. Lincoln thus got the war he needed to bolster his administration and institute the blockade of Southern ports. The US Supreme Court ruled that the war began with Lincoln's proclamation of a blockade.

It may indeed be hazardous to mess with those who assume they control or suppress your economy for their own benefit.

299 posted on 10/21/2019 10:17:16 PM PDT by rustbucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: Bulwyf

Canada being a Confederation of Provinces could separate easier than the states of a republic.

Greater Toronto and Central Montreal are the problems, because they have so many Federal seats, they decide who becomes the government. It is like two little pieces of fly shit on half a continent that rule the whole rest of nation. If they were removed from Canada they would fade away in very little time.


300 posted on 10/21/2019 10:33:14 PM PDT by free_life (If you ask Jesus to forgive you and to save you, He will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320321-336 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson