Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump: "We're Going to Take Look At' Suing Schiff, Pelosi"
Newsmax ^ | 10/13/19 | Eric Mack

Posted on 10/13/2019 10:20:34 AM PDT by grimalkin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 10/13/2019 10:20:34 AM PDT by grimalkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grimalkin

good sue them.


2 posted on 10/13/2019 10:23:28 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Can it be class action?

I can use the $$


3 posted on 10/13/2019 10:27:00 AM PDT by dp0622 (Bad, bad company Till the day I die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

AND THIS: Schiff admits he should have been ‘much more clear’ about contact with whistleblower
Fox News ^ | 13 October 2019 | Andrew O’Reilly
Posted on 10/13/2019, 1:19:58 PM by E. Pluribus Unum

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., admitted on Sunday that he should have been clearer about his contact with the whistleblower who filed a complaint about President Trump’s July phone call with the Ukrainian president.

“I should have been much more clear,” Schiff said during an interview on CBS’ “Face The Nation.”

Fox News reported earlier this month that the intelligence community whistleblower did not disclose contact with Schiff’s staff to the intelligence committee inspector general (ICIG).

The sources said ICIG Michael Atkinson told lawmakers in a closed session that the whistleblower did not disclose the contact with the California Democrat’s committee and that Atkinson didn’t investigate that contact as he had no knowledge of it.

Sources also told Fox News that Atkinson also revealed that the whistleblower volunteered he or she was a registered Democrat and that they had a prior working relationship with a prominent Democratic politician.

Schiff’s office acknowledged earlier this month that the whistleblower had reached out to them before filing a complaint in mid-August, giving Democrats advance warning of the accusations that would lead them to launch an impeachment inquiry days later.

The source said Atkinson told lawmakers he did not know how a Schiff tweet in August and other statements about Ukraine appeared to reflect the substance of the whistleblower complaint, which was not declassified and not shared with Congress until the end of September.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


4 posted on 10/13/2019 10:27:39 AM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin

Absolutely, that was clear cut slander with malicious intent.


5 posted on 10/13/2019 10:28:17 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (As long as Hillary walks free, equal justice under the law will never exist in the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin

Good.

The best defense is an offense.


6 posted on 10/13/2019 10:31:20 AM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin

As much as I’d love to see him sue, I think it’s just bluster. They were going to look into suing everyone involved in the Kavanaugh attacks, as well as suing the Oakland mayor for obstructing the law. Not having any serious blow back is why these people just keep getting away with such malice.


7 posted on 10/13/2019 10:35:49 AM PDT by JudyinCanada (Aim low, avoid disappointment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin

May not have Civil immunity. Also, treason/sedition. he undermined the POYUS regarding our National Security.


8 posted on 10/13/2019 10:38:15 AM PDT by DrDude (Looks like it is Game! Set! Match!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin

HOORAY Chief

MAGA


9 posted on 10/13/2019 10:39:49 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dp0622
Can it be class action? I can use the $$

Ha ha ha! I'm in!

10 posted on 10/13/2019 10:47:17 AM PDT by LittleBillyInfidel (This tagline has been formatted to fit the screen. Some content has been edited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin
They say, 'sir, he has immunity, because he said it in Congress he has immunity.'

Who said they have immunity?

If someone gave them immunity...someone else can take it away.

11 posted on 10/13/2019 11:02:08 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob ("Other People's Money" = The life blood of Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin

where in written law does it say members of Congress have immunity????


12 posted on 10/13/2019 11:07:50 AM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said theoal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob
Then that would make him "above the law"...

In what world is he living??

13 posted on 10/13/2019 11:09:35 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin
You better act fast, Donald.
14 posted on 10/13/2019 11:09:49 AM PDT by Rapscallion (If they are not for Trump, they are against him. Fire them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin

I beginning to see why dueling was part of polite society. I doubt these guys would talk this much if they knew that it would be the last thing they would do.


15 posted on 10/13/2019 11:10:05 AM PDT by Snook79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin
"I'm going to go after him," Trump said. "They say, 'sir, he has immunity, because he said it in Congress he has immunity.' I don't care about immunity. He can't have immunity. He made up a phone call."

How can our Congress have immunity and be above the law? There is something wrong with this picture!

No one is above the law in the USA, so I thought.

16 posted on 10/13/2019 11:10:51 AM PDT by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: olezip

https://www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/articles/1/essays/26/privilege-from-arrest


17 posted on 10/13/2019 11:15:06 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin; flaglady47
Article 1 - Section 6 (Constitution)

"Members of both Houses of Congress shall in all cases except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from arrest during sessions of their respective Houses and going to and from the same - and for any speech or debate in either Houses they shall not be questioned in any other place."

Leni

18 posted on 10/13/2019 11:25:30 AM PDT by MinuteGal ( MAGA ! ! !....MAGA ! ! !....MAGA ! ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin

Hit’em, and hit hard, the POTUS way.


19 posted on 10/13/2019 11:29:24 AM PDT by romanesq (8Chan and its child porn, violence and murders are kaput. So is the QAnon grift with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grimalkin; Liz; olezip; Sacajaweau; elpadre; Cowboy Bob; Trump Girl Kit Cat
See my #18 above.

Leni

20 posted on 10/13/2019 11:30:00 AM PDT by MinuteGal ( MAGA ! ! !....MAGA ! ! !....MAGA ! ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson