If you'd like to be on or off the Clarice Feldman ping list, usually issued only on Sunday morning, please click Private Reply below and drop me a FReepmail.
Who says a formal impeachment inquiry requires a vote of the full house?
Is it in the Constitution?
See, even if it was, it would not matter one bit. The dems could give a poop about the Constitution. Why would coup plotters care about rules? They are drafting the articles of impeachment as I write this and will have a a formal vote when they return from recess. Not on starting an inquiry, but passing the articles out of the House.
Nan sent her members home to build support. But they wont be able to build actual support. Instead, NaN sent her members home to allow the media to build its faux support with fake polls and the usual aplomb of ten panel news shows of nodding bobble heads. You know, like Russian Collusion and the same polls that had Hillary as a lock.
Given such huge support for impeachment, there will be a short debate when the House returns followed by a quick vote.
I recall that they already took a vote, and that only 93 members of the House voted in favor. So why is this charade is proceeding anyway?
As quickly as this whole thing was pushed, from an announcement that there was a whistleblower complaint to the almost immediate announcement that an impeachment inquiry is going forward without a single substantiating fact, tells me that this whole thing was planned and orchestrated to protect Bidens Presidential run. Too bad the House isnt as dedicated to performing its actual Constitutional duties as it is to achieving DemocRAT conquer and control.
Pee Wee’s playhouse
The author makes a lot of assumption, all dubious.
1. “Vulnerable Democrats won’t vote for impeachment.” Ha, they will vote as they are told, or else. Articles of Impeachment have been introduced several times since 20 Jan 2017.
2. “Two-thirds vote in the Senate. That won’t happen”. Ha, I count at least 55 to convict and probably closer to 62. Don’t forget that little Johnny Roberts is the presiding judge.
3. “civics and Constitutional ignorance of their base”. While that may be 50% of the country, does the other half stay quiet and let this all happen? Doubtful, at best. Acquiescence at worst.
The RATS are acting like its already a done deal, that Trump will be gone in a week. When so we march on Washington??
Playing fast and loose with the law, and changing the rules to suit the ‘need’...both are hallmarks of the dhimmicraps.
And, as long as the pubbies don’t fight back, nothing will change.
It really does look like both parties are on the same team...one world government and nothing but subjugated masses, everywhere.
Jefferson was right.
An open trial gives a Trump defense team the opportunity of discovering not only who the whistleblower is but also the leakers who provided the info, as well as direct info on Biden and his son.
The Democrats, again, are counting on the civics and Constitutional ignorance of their base.
Amen to that democrats and media can sell anything to the idiots.