Posted on 09/20/2019 5:57:56 PM PDT by PJ-Comix
If the mainstream media wants to find out why fewer and fewer people take them seriously, a September 18 article in the Washington Post would be towards the top of the piles of evidence. The very title of the story by Hannah Natanson reflects both the extreme shallowness along with the obvious bias to produce the incredibly cringeworthy "Frederick Douglass photos smashed stereotypes. Could Elizabeth Warren selfies do the same?"
Groan! And if you think the body of the article will somehow will redeem itself you would be wrong. It is also chock full of embarrassing cheerleading for Warren while attempting to stretch to make an absurd connection between Warren selfies and Douglass photos.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
The Republican Frederick Douglas?
Frederick Douglass was NEVER a Wigwam Flipper...
So Frederick Douglass was a white guy who only pretended to be a slave in order to advance his career?
Who thinks up this shit?
Frederick Douglass, a pro-gun Republican, said in his autobiography “A man’s rights rest in three boxes. The ballot box, the jury box and the cartridge box”.
So which is she, Native American or freed African slave? Maybe shell next claim some extraterrestrial heritage.
Here’s you answer....someone totally unqualified
From in-turd to paid Post reporter in 14 months.
Hannah Natanson is a reporter covering social issues in the D.C. metro area. She joined The Washington Post as an intern in June 2018. Follow
Warren doesn’t look anything like Douglass. She looks like an old spinster “school marm” from the 1800s.
Partisan Media Shills update.
Guess the Washington Post wants to move away from ‘vile’ and move toward ‘silly’ and ‘inane’... how creepy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.