“Hell, Ah thought ah did a pretty good job of defining sex!”
Posted on 08/20/2019 12:03:30 PM PDT by Kaslin
Well, they redefined the word, “marriage”. Why not sex. And while their at it, I’ve always thought that “hot” and “cold” were way too binary.
“right” and “wrong” are also way too binary
and racist too
/s
Trannies at Hooters. Next time on Oprah.
I’d like to see them define what consummation of marriage means now that they’ve totally fubar’d the definition of marriage.
Well, I’ve always said what is moral isn’t necessarily legal, and what is legal isn’t necessarily moral. It’s high time the SCOTUS put some teeth behind that concept!
“Hell, Ah thought ah did a pretty good job of defining sex!”
Seriously. Jesus cannot come soon enough.
What God says about blindness comes more and more apparant every day.
Hooters are struggling to stay afloat as it is. I wanted to go to one before they closed. My wife said ‘no!’ My daughter and grandsons ended up accompanying me. It was quite tasteful and I DO mean the food!
Good Lord! .... is this a joke? This is pure Social Justice. SJ has no bearing on fact....therefore can impose NO justice.
The Funeral Home did not hire the woman....a MAN was hired to represent the good wishes of the Funeral Home. Think about it.....maybe for a nano second. One would hope the SCOTUS has better cases to hear.
Sorta like their, there, and they’re
“unlawful sex stereotyping” Is that a thing? Càn you be prosecuted for it?
IF I see a Trannie anywhere, I leave. Have seen one shopping right next to me in the women’s department and IT creeped me out.
At least IT was a full-grown man.
I read about that yesterday
Their trying to get there dog over they’re.
Yes. Once SCOTUS used equal protection (incorrectly) as a basis for allowing same-sex marriage, this opens the door to a commercial enterprise in large-number-parties marriage. For a fee, you and thousands of others can marry me and thus obtain the privilidges I have with medical insurance companies, health insurance companies, and so on.
The catch to this plan is the necessity and form of consumation of marriage.
In all seriousness, I'd marry each of my children if this would serve some business or economic benefit for my children, such as remaining on my health insurance plan. (And my wife would go for it.) The courts and your local court house COULD NOT reject it, based on SCOTUS' (incorrect) use of equal protection.
I don’t know if you are F or M. I am F and there is no way that would want to be a mortician.
They cannot define sex or marriage. They can affirm or deny the truth of Scripture.
My beef is with “up” and “down”. Heck, they don’t even mean anything at all, in outer space. If I want to walk on the ceiling, who are you to tell me I can’t.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.