>>Dishonest Danny Denier: “Are you getting senile, Alinsky Joe? You posted a picture of one of Graur’s books, he was the one of the primary interviewee of the 2017 New Scientist article you linked, and you have mentioned him on more than one occasion? In post #260 there was this exchange:
>>[Kalamata:] “I would say that Graur was none-to-happy with the results published by the consortium.”
>>[Dilusional Joey] “Nor should he be, nor have we seen any response from ENCODE to Graur’s remarks.”
>> Kalamata: “You are exceptionally dishonest, Alinsky Joe. You can get away with those stunts with the unwashed masses, but not with me.”
>>Dishonest & Dilusional Joey: “I’ve posted nothing dishonest, your frequent claims otherwise notwithstanding. In this case I simply googled up quotes to support my point and apparently Graur’s was one. You then attacked Graur as if he were your personal nemesis, and that is what I responded to.
I guess that means you plagiarized, Dishonest Joey. My apologies for thinking you were being honest — that those were your own words.
*****************
>>Dishonest & Dilusional Joey: “So clearly what’s going on here is that Dishonest Danny has lost track of your own lies and naturally wish to project dishonesty onto yours truly. That’s your use of Denier Rule #5.
Silly child.
Mr. Kalamata
Now, now, Danny boy, there's no need for you to lie about this -- I've been very careful to put in quotes, italics and links for whatever is copied here.
So there's no need to "plagiarize" and my own words are in plain text.
But I confess to being utterly baffled by whatever it is that's driving you so bananas over Graur and some others too.
Danny Denier: "Silly child."
Denier Rule #5.