Nadler is a fool.
He can say anything he wants to on the floor. There he has immunity.
But on TV or talking to the press, he is subject to the same libel laws as you and I.
Trump will be careful while e is in office for the reason that he would like to have some of the more sensible dims helping him on legislation.
But after he leaves office he will be free to be aggressive with Nadler and the other nut cases.
It will be more than interesting.
They might need to build a courthouse just for his cases.
Trump will be careful while e is in office for the reason that he would like to have some of the more sensible dims helping him on legislation.
- -
Sensible Dems? Talk about an endangered species.
Actually the libel/slander laws concerning “public figures” generally require that the plaintiff be shown to have NOT BELIEVED what he/she stated/published. = Tell me HOW to PROVE that some crackpot does NOT believe what he/she said/printed, unless they are stupid enough to admit that they never believed the data??
That’s why the libel/slander laws BADLY need a complete reform. = As I’ve previously said on this forum, I know of a HS football coach that was libeled in a local newspaper & falsely accused by certain individuals of “fondling students” & of “indecent assaults on minor females”.
Even though his lawyer got the charges dismissed with prejudice & the charges were thereafter PROVEN to be “trumped-up”, based in the personal dislike by his ex-wife & utterly FALSE, he was unable to recover damages to his reputation, meritless dismissal from employment as he was determined to BE a “public figure”.
Yours, TMN78247