Skip to comments.Kamala Harris: If elected, my DOJ would have 'no choice' but to prosecute Trump
Posted on 06/12/2019 7:47:47 AM PDT by knighthawk
2020 candidate Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., has issued a stunning warning to President Trump that seems to echo controversial recent comments from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, saying her Justice Department would likely charge him with obstruction of justice if she wins the White House.
Harris, in a newly released interview, said she believes the only reason former Special Counsel Robert Mueller did not recommend prosecuting Trump was because of the Justice Departments policy against indicting a sitting president. Once out of office, Trump would be subject to charges -- and Harris was emphatic in saying the DOJ should pursue them.
I believe that they would have no choice and that they should, yes, Harris said on this weeks NPR Politics Podcast.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
No danger of that happening, Kamala...
Ah, Kammi Koo Koo, the horizontal senator speaks!
Besides bookmaking, loansharking, theft, a million speeding and red light tickets, destruction of property and maybe 3 others that I can’t mention here (no make that 4) I have been a SAINT!!
No make that 5.
ALL VERY long ago and I am now a Proud, Law Abiding citizen of the US.
Except for maybe 2 things
Good point! Hearing 5 people chant "Lock him up" would be underwhelming.
she shouldn’t have any problem when 0bama is indicted and prosecuted . . . . . . .
Hawaii makes new US citizens of any and everyone it seems. Ilhan Abdullahi Omar, (US Representative); Barack Hussein Obama, (x-POTUS) were both given US BCs when Hawaii became a state. No frills, no fuss, no kidding. The number of years this might go on is probably few, but it happened and is something which should be remedied before used on a sleeping electorate again.
Don’t they tell us that one of Trump’s dictatorial traits is that he tries to tell the DOJ who they should prosecute?
When Dims are in power its “their DOJ”, but Trump can’t even speak to the AG without a-holes on the left scream the sky is falling. Heels-up Harris is ineligible, anyway.
She’d prosecute him for obstruction of justice because he tweeted that he didn’t do what Mueller found to have not been done by him.
For what? or is that not a concern....?
Why wait kamala.....just get a hooded lynch party together and take vigilante action....the demonrats are just an old sane lawless scrum anyway .....
Kamala Harris: proof that moving from one of the oldest professions to the other is indeed possible.
Well, technically Trump could simply issue himself a blanket pardon on his last day in office and then they couldn’t indict him for spit.
“MY” DOJ-—— how telling. Just who and what would be “your” DOJ camel toe round heels? The Beria section?
The non-US Citizen prosecutor’s section— with spanish names, or jamaican posse rope burning druggies?
Give up and go home— you are too stupid for words, caramela.
more like “lay-overs”.... his uh putter isn’t as stiff as it used to be.... so maybe it would be a different “relationship”.
Disgusting harridan, and hag— desperate and somehow, wonder if anyone would comment, bet she has an odor, like they say about hitlery. Hygeine and all.
And the left continues spiraling downward to Third World status. It’s a routine in such sh**holes to prosecute, heck even assassinate, former heads of state after a transition of power. Now that three dem big shots are calling for such post-election prosecution, who will be the first to call for his execution? Waters is always a good bet, but she may be too busy snagging her billions from the banks.
She never prosecuted Harvey Weinstein.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.