Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Supreme Court rejects challenges to silencer laws.
CNN ^ | 6/10/2019 | Ariane de Vogue

Posted on 06/10/2019 7:46:24 AM PDT by Carriage Hill

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last
To: carriage_hill

Amen.


81 posted on 06/10/2019 2:07:34 PM PDT by TADSLOS (You know why you can enjoy a day at the Zoo? Because walls work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

Thank you for the correction.

I saw the reference and thought this was something new being challenged. I haven’t followed suppressors closely over the years.


82 posted on 06/10/2019 2:08:03 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Can I get a shout out for the person(s) who donated $2,000.00 from France? Thanks so much! Wow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Free Will ... good song


83 posted on 06/10/2019 2:28:03 PM PDT by Spacetrucker (George Washington didn't use his freedom of speech to defeat the British - HE SHOT THEM .. WITH GUNS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Congress has the authority granted to it by the Constitution to levy taxes.


84 posted on 06/10/2019 7:37:35 PM PDT by wastedyears (The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

The wording of SCOTUS rulings always confuses me. I have to read comments to get an understanding of what the ruling means. Everyone speaks in double-negative language!


85 posted on 06/11/2019 6:20:31 AM PDT by New Jersey Realist ( Be kind to your children. They will determine where you live when you get old.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: New Jersey Realist

Me too.


86 posted on 06/11/2019 6:25:07 AM PDT by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
An appeals court had held that a silencer is not a "bearable" arm protected by the Constitution.

I’m totally confused. If it’s not “bearable” and of itself not a weapon, why does it need to be registered at all. It’s kind of a circular argument.

87 posted on 06/11/2019 6:31:39 AM PDT by Shethink13 (there are 0 electoral votes in the state of denial)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Shethink13
"An appeals court had held that a silencer is not a "bearable" arm protected by the Constitution."

I’m totally confused. If it’s not “bearable” and of itself not a weapon, why does it need to be registered at all. It’s kind of a circular argument.

No, you have merged two concepts that the appeals court did not.

I am not for this, I'm just explaining it. The appeals court did not find that a silencer on its own is a "bearable" arm and therefore is not protected by the Second Amendment.

However, just because it is not a "bearable" arm, does not mean it is not a firearm. The 1934 NFA defines silencers as "firearms" for the purposes of taxation (and subsequent regulation.)

Similarly, a Lightning Link drop in auto sear is not a machine gun, but it is defined as a machine gun for purposes of the NFA.

88 posted on 06/11/2019 7:28:47 AM PDT by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: LeonardFMason

> I realize they are NOT “arms”

The sure as hell are not alcohol, tobacco or explosives.

Damn the fed gov.


89 posted on 06/11/2019 1:53:32 PM PDT by old-ager (anti-new-ager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

SC is corrupt.

Outrageous.

Silencers (legal term, folks) are sure as hell not Alcohol, Tobacco or Explosives.

What agency regulates them?

What is interstate about a produce made and consumed all within one US state?

Outrage!

KS, MO, OK, TX, LA, MS: secede.


90 posted on 06/11/2019 1:55:47 PM PDT by old-ager (anti-new-ager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Dacula

There are two areas that might address your question. Sorry if I fail to understand you.

1. some states ban them outright. so maybe tx repealed a prior ban. this would not override federal meddling (NFA)

2. some states are starting to work on nullifying federal firearms laws outright.


91 posted on 06/11/2019 2:05:32 PM PDT by old-ager (anti-new-ager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: LeonardFMason

> I realize they are NOT “arms” Federal Law disagrees with you.

Right. We must never concede this. They sure as hell are not Alcohol or Tobacco or Explosives.

SC is corrupt and fed gov is out of control.


92 posted on 06/11/2019 2:09:16 PM PDT by old-ager (anti-new-ager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson