Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Steve Van Doorn
I still think Sessions was needed to do exactly what he did

Sadly, I think that's giving Sessions too much credit. The crime of illegal surveillance would still have been present, before, during, and after Mueller's investigation concluded. ANY Attorney General should have not stood for that. I have no good opinion of Sessions, nor do I necessarily have a bad one. Until given evidence otherwise. I don't think he was a deep state plant, however he was a terrible AG and probably too protective of institutions that once were thought worthy of preservation, but have now been politicized to the point of lawlessness. Sessions couldn't/wouldn't see that.

22 posted on 06/07/2019 10:40:45 AM PDT by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Magnum44; FreeReign
"The crime of illegal surveillance would still have been present, before, during, and after Mueller's investigation concluded."

Yes, that I agree. Sessions didn't act when he clearly should've. Thanks

33 posted on 06/07/2019 11:09:15 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson