Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court upholds Indiana law requiring burial or cremation after an abortion
Washington Examiner ^ | 05/28/19

Posted on 05/28/2019 7:32:01 AM PDT by Liberty7732

The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued an order that will allow Indiana to enforce a law mandating the burial or cremation of fetal remains following an abortion.

The order marks the first case under the more conservative Supreme Court makeup to challenge the parameters of Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that legalized abortion nationwide. The Indiana case was closely watched since the Supreme Court began discussing it in January. The justices met about it more than a dozen times.

The order by the Supreme Court overturns an appeals court decision from the 7th Circuit that held Indiana’s stated interest in “the ‘humane and dignified disposal of human remains’” was “not . . . legitimate.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: 7thcircuit; 7thcircus; abortion; indiana; infanticide; lawsuit; medicareforall; mikepence; obamacare; petebuttigieg; robertscourt; ruling; southbend

1 posted on 05/28/2019 7:32:01 AM PDT by Liberty7732
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

Says a lot....”sanctity of life”...might say it best.


2 posted on 05/28/2019 7:45:15 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

Well isn’t that just a shame Planned Parenthood won’t be able to profit from the baby body parts market in Indiana. If their taxpayer money is cut off then they might as well close up shop. What would be the point because we sure as hell know none of it is about helping women.


3 posted on 05/28/2019 7:48:22 AM PDT by MagnoliaB (You can't always get what you want but if you try sometime you might find, you get what you need.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

Seems like a lot of trouble to endure for a clump of cells. /sarc

As 10 Bears said, “it shall be life.” Can’t wait to read the syllabus.


4 posted on 05/28/2019 7:51:33 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (#Dregs #DeplorableMe #BitterClinger #HillNO! #cishet #MyPresident #MAGA #Winning #covfefe #BuildIt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

I would guess the purpose was to prevent woman from having babies in order to sell the babies parts after abortion. There could be whole “farms” of woman doing it.....sex slaves...pimps...payoffs to woman getting pregnant...abortion docs...abortion nurses...planned parenthood...body parts brokers etc. could be in on the action.


5 posted on 05/28/2019 7:52:07 AM PDT by Getready (Wisdom is more valuable than gold and diamonds, and harder to find.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

Yeah, because a HUMAN BEING was killed.


6 posted on 05/28/2019 7:58:54 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

Excellent move!

Abortion? OK, but no dead baby part sales from it. Then we’ll see how altruistic Planned Parenthood actually is (not).


7 posted on 05/28/2019 8:00:33 AM PDT by polymuser (It's discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and how few by deceit. Noel Coward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

Does this prevent the sale of baby parts?


8 posted on 05/28/2019 8:07:30 AM PDT by Sasparilla ( I'm Not Tired of Winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

You rang sir?

https://casetext.com/case/box-v-planned-parenthood-of-indiana-and-kentucky-inc


9 posted on 05/28/2019 8:09:04 AM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

So what was the breakdown?


10 posted on 05/28/2019 8:09:14 AM PDT by rhinohunter (Dear Mr. Trump: I'm still not tired of winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

Yes it’s going to put a huge crimp in Murder Inc. profits.


11 posted on 05/28/2019 8:12:24 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rhinohunter

Per curiam! RBG concurred in part and dissented in part. Thomas wrote a concurring opinion.


12 posted on 05/28/2019 8:12:56 AM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

At least it does in Indiana.


13 posted on 05/28/2019 8:18:54 AM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

“at least it does in Indiana”

Don’t SCOTUS decisions apply in all US circuits? They are the law.

For example, McDonald and Heller apply everywhere,not just Chicago. So does Brown v Board of education. Miranda,etc.


14 posted on 05/28/2019 8:26:05 AM PDT by Sasparilla ( I'm Not Tired of Winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

Tyvm. Justice Thomas wrote “the supposed constitutionality of abortion.” Bam!


15 posted on 05/28/2019 8:33:17 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (#Dregs #DeplorableMe #BitterClinger #HillNO! #cishet #MyPresident #MAGA #Winning #covfefe #BuildIt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

You are so right.

Fetal remains = human remains =The human fetus is a person.

Human life demands life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Thus the end of Roe v Wade.

It cannot come soon enough.


16 posted on 05/28/2019 2:10:21 PM PDT by victim soul (victim soul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson