“It doesn’t pass the smell test until more specifics are given.”
The guy says he will give evidence directly, but why would you be interested in according the other side the benefit of innocent until proven guilty when that concept is denied to our side. Ever heard of Stormy Daniels and her proof?
“The guy says he will give evidence directly, but why would you be interested in according the other side the benefit of innocent until proven guilty when that concept is denied to our side. Ever heard of Stormy Daniels and her proof?”
I don’t judge on guilt or innocence until I know the facts. Isn’t that the way it’s supposed to be? If you disagree, I would be interested in knowing why.