You can believe Einstein or you can believe that UFOs are aliens from a star millions of light years away. You can’t believe both.
What if the aliens don’t believe in Einstein? ;)
Thinking aliens had to fly here from some distant galaxy is "inside the box" thinking. Even Einstein would agree with that.
Einstein said, “I am not saying it’s aliens, but ... it’s aliens.”
So according to you our technology is the very most advanced in the entire Universe? Lol, must be wonderful to be so all knowing as you.
No one knows how many planets there are in the Universe but in order to convey a sense of the enormity of the Universe it has been suggested the number of stars (suns) in the Universe surpass the number of grains of sand on every beach on Earth.
Even this mind boggling thought does not include the planets which may be in orbit around the stars.
Rather then taking the position we exist alone in the unimaginably huge Universe I take the position it is simply impossible to the greatest degree possible that we are alone.
If God created man gave us this world to inhabit, why did he create those uncounted gazillion stars and planets? Where does it say God created man in only one place?
Even taking religion out of the argument it is as near a mathematical certainty imagineable life exists in other places other than our planet.
Appeal to authority.
You have more faith in Einstein than I have in God. Sucks being an agnostic.
The Michelson-Morley experiment was only done on earth.IOW, the results could have been every bit as reliable as wind velocity measurements taken from a balloon freely floating in the hurricane.IF the matter forming the planets was swept together by vortexes of aether, one could reasonably expect that over a billion years or so the rotating mass and the swirling aether would drag each other to the same velocity.
Any attempt to measure the speed of light relative to that differential velocity (between the moving surface of the earth and the static frame of an immovable aether) would fail as the moving mass and the aether would have long since equilibrated to the same velocity.
Same argument for the earths motion about the sun, and the suns motion relative to the center of the galaxy. Were all being swept along with the flow of the aether.
Einstein envisioned space as being warped into gravitational wells. These are always drawn as if they are simple depressions in a perfect grid of graph paper.
Suppose those wells are not simple dimples, but are swirling vortexes of aether. Like a whirlpool on the surface of water, theyd tend to accumulate any matter floating on the surface, and that matter would tend to acquire the same spin as the surface of the whirlpool.
Easy enough to test. Do the the Michelson-Morley experiment on a cubesat or deep space probe cutting across the flow of the aether...
Faulty data, faulty explanation...
Cause Albert is the first, last and only voice on all the physics in the entire universe.
Albert was BRILLIANT! But even he had problems wrapping his very considerable brain around some things.
Spooky action at a distance?
Interdimensional travel is possible. Space can be ‘folded’ and you can pass from one location to another (potentially) without actually covering the linear distance.
Someday, our kids might watch old episodes of Star Trek and say, “That’s funny. Our parents thought space was a vacuum, everybody knows it’s a fabric.”
Yes, you can.
Einsteins’s equations allow for “wormholes” (yes, actual real things) which describes exactly the propulsion method described by Bob Lazar for the alien spacefcraft he examined.
You don’t think we already know everything there is to know, do you?
Einstein didn’t believe Quantum Mechanics could be real. He never did manage to unify everything, so clearly his understanding of the system was incomplete.