> There is a difference between original jurisdiction and > exclusive original jurisdiction. The Constitution does
> not grant exclusive original jurisdiction over state-part
> cases to the Supreme Court. Its original jurisdiction is
> concurrent with other courts.
This is a legal precedence or a scholar commentary? I’m able to read USConstitution; I’m able to read law; where does the law say what the above comment claims.
Precedence and scholars are the establishment, the box we’ve been forced into. We need to reconsider our captivity and the false concepts which lead to destruction.
the tasty stuff just keeps coming. Thanks.