Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Analysis of 20 Studies Finds 151% Increased Breast Cancer Risk After Abortion
Lifenews.com ^ | Jan 7, 2019 | Angela Lanfranchi MD FACS

Posted on 01/08/2019 6:39:56 PM PST by kathsua

In February 2017, the Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology published the “Epidemiology of breast cancer in Indian women.”

Malvia, et al. found that from 1982-2005, the incidence of breast cancer had almost doubled. Breast cancer is now the leading cause of cancer deaths in women in India. India’s burden of breast cancer is ever increasing and now impacting 1.5 million women a year.

Moreover women suffering from breast cancer were a decade younger than women in western countries. Most breast cancers in India occur in women in their 30s and 40s!

Link to abortion

In 2018, the Breast Cancer Prevention Institute funded and published “Induced Abortion as an Independent Risk Factor for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies on South Asian Women” in Issues in Law and Medicine. (A meta-analysis looks at separate but similar studies in order to use the pooled data for statistical significance. It is regarded by scientists as very strong evidence.)

Of the 20 studies analyzed, 16 were done on Indian women. The meta-analysis found a 151% increased risk of breast cancer after an induced abortion.

In 2014, “Breast Cancer and Induced Abortion,” an analysis also published in Issues in Law and Medicine, revealed that the incidence of breast cancers increased 10-14 years after an abortion. This analysis was consistent with the known biology of breast cancer. There was no statistically significant increase in breast cancer risk before 10 years and after 14 years of an abortion.

Induced abortion in India, referred to as “Medical Termination of Pregnancy,” was legalized in 1971. Sons are most highly prized and sex selection abortions, although illegal, are not uncommon.

REACH PRO-LIFE PEOPLE WORLDWIDE! Advertise with LifeNews to reach hundreds of thousands of pro-life readers every week. Contact us today.

A study published in the Lancet 2006 and based on conservative assumptions, reported that the practice of sex-selection accounts for about a half million missing female births yearly. Over the past two decades this translates into the abortion of some 10 million female fetuses.

Of the 20 studies, 16 were of Indian women. The meta-analysis found a 151% increased risk of breast cancer after an induced abortion.

In 2014, “Breast Cancer and Induced Abortion,” an analysis also published in Issues in Law and Medicine, revealed that the incidence of breast cancers increased 10-14 years after an abortion. This analysis was consistent with the known biology of breast cancer. There was no statistically significant increase in breast cancer risk before 10 years and after 14 years of an abortion.

According to UNICEF, 27% of Indian women marry by the age of 18. Breast cancer in these young women cuts to the heart of the family leaving young children without mothers and husbands without wives.

In addition to the tragic loss of female unborn babies, sex selection abortion leads to abnormal male/female ratios, resulting in a disordered society of men without a spouse and many other regrettable social outcomes.

We can only hope and pray that education and changes of heart will lead to better outcomes for both women and men.

LifeNews Note: Angela Lanfranchi, MD FACS, is President of the Breast Cancer Prevention Institute.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; breastcancer; prochoice; prolife
More evidence that abortion is not about helping women's health.
1 posted on 01/08/2019 6:39:56 PM PST by kathsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kathsua

L8r


2 posted on 01/08/2019 6:42:53 PM PST by preacher ( Journalism no longer reports news, they use news to shape our society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kathsua

Women will see this and demand more money for breast cancer research, not putting an end to abortion.

If it were smoking causingthe increase, well, you know they would demand and end to smoking.


3 posted on 01/08/2019 6:45:09 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kathsua

more $ for PP
abortions + prophylactic bilateral mastectomies


4 posted on 01/08/2019 6:45:28 PM PST by dontreadthis (A TIMELINE OF TREASON on Profile Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kathsua

Wrong link


5 posted on 01/08/2019 6:48:16 PM PST by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kathsua

Scientific facts are sexist and demeaning to women. A woman cannot be free if she cannot murder her offspring.


6 posted on 01/08/2019 6:52:33 PM PST by Trumpisourlastchance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kathsua

New evidence?

The CDC has listed abortion as a class I carcinogen, right up there with cigarettes, for many years

You abruptly screw around with those hormones, estrogen and progesterone, and you expect no repercussions?

Total stupidity


7 posted on 01/08/2019 6:52:58 PM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kathsua
Why does abortion cause breast cancer?

When a woman is pregnant hormones are rushing through her body in preparation for the baby. The cells in the breast are opened to receive the correct hormones to prepare for lactation. These cells are closed naturally after the birth or natural miscarriage of the baby.

When a woman gets an abortion the hormonal mechanism that closes the breast tissue cells does not do its job. This leaves the breast tissue open and vulnerable to cancer.

8 posted on 01/08/2019 7:01:01 PM PST by Slyfox (Not my circus, not my monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kathsua

Thanks for info. I will check it out tomorrow.


9 posted on 01/08/2019 7:12:15 PM PST by Kay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kay

The New England Journal Of Medicine wrote that 20 years ago. They paid a price for that truth.


10 posted on 01/08/2019 7:19:53 PM PST by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kathsua

Bttt


11 posted on 01/08/2019 7:21:03 PM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60's....You weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kathsua

The medical oligarchy has long rejected the notion that abortion can cause breast cancer.


12 posted on 01/08/2019 7:27:20 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kathsua

I’m all for abortion if the kid gets equal chance. Flip the coin - heads kid lives parents die, tails they get to walk out. Otherwise there is no excuse.


13 posted on 01/08/2019 7:29:30 PM PST by wgmalabama (Mittens is the new Juan. Go away mittens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kathsua

Link does not go to article.


14 posted on 01/08/2019 7:36:32 PM PST by jonrick46 (Cultural Marxism is the cult of the Left waiting for the Mothership.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

Thanks for posting.. i was unaware of the actual inner workings. Just like other sinful behavior there are deadly consequences. I wold likt to see the raw data


15 posted on 01/08/2019 7:40:00 PM PST by momincombatboots (Billions to Mexico & Central America and No wall for YOU. #MAGA But violent felons are free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Yes. I have been following along over the years.

FYI! The University of California (!!!!) hospital in my city does late term abortions for no medical reason other than that the mother does not want the baby. I had a patient who had had an abortion at 24 weeks in our Univ of Calif hospital just because she and her boyfriend changed their minds. She had also had prior abortions.

Turns out the hospital started to do late term abortions because they needed the revenue!!

I cannot believe that the university of California has fallen so low. Never would have believed it. It’s like slavery. Such an awful disgrace.


16 posted on 01/08/2019 7:52:44 PM PST by Kay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kathsua

Breast feeding is key to women’s health
No baby means higher risk of many things


17 posted on 01/08/2019 9:17:37 PM PST by Truthoverpower (The guvmint you get is the Trump winning express !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kathsua

This is NOT new evidence, these studies demonstrating the link between abortion and Breast cancer have been published for over 30 years, we get a new one every few years, they all say the same thing, Abortion leads to Breast Cancer.


18 posted on 01/09/2019 5:21:28 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

Was just about to point it out. This is what the link leads to.

Doctors Said He Was Almost Brain Dead, So His Family Said Their Goodbyes. Then He Recovered


19 posted on 01/09/2019 8:23:53 AM PST by GailA (Wife of RET. SCPO, GET OVER IT, DONALD TRUMP IS PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson