Ticks and snakes and Voles. Oh My!
I’m so skerred of more reports coming out that some one asked me if I had a potato in the back of my pants or something else more dire had occurred. No doubt more money will help us from suffering from these awful things.
Better stock up on these...
Their “research grant” must be running out of cash...
Isn’t that the same number of genders recently discovered?
I thought it was 721 climate change effects we had watch for.
Anyway...
The effects are already here, I had to resort to a row boat oar to beat back the voles this morning.
To me, this kind of “study” is proof only that there’s a lot of money in the “climate change” industry and it’s all on one side.
What are the chances that in a complex biosphere like earth, 1 or 2 degrees of warming will cause 467 distinct catastrophes and not 1 single benefit to anyone or any animal? The only possible way to get that result if you have a ‘climate change’ market structure in which discovering a new catastrophe associated with global warming will advance your career and discovering beneficial results will not.
If you had an actual scientific approach, it’s possible that the vast majority of effects of any change could be negative, but 467 out of 467 is not possible and signals a market structure that calls every single one of those studies into question.
Methods
Synthesis of impacts.
To compile the observed impacts on people from climate hazards, we searched Google Scholar from February to March 2017 using a full text search in English for publications on the impacts of ten hazards of the Earths climate system ...
So their so-called study is a google search. The only useful information I gleaned from this so called study is the answer to the question of what are all the millenials going to do after they graduate and become professors?
You can tell it is BS because none of the positive impacts are given as much weight.