All this does is throw Garret under the bus. Repressed memories are usually fake to begin with. Nothing about her story makes sense.
Most likely she was a drunken whore who CONSENTED to sex to boost her self-esteem. Prove me wrong MSM, I have just as much proof as this chick.
And Garrett apparently DID sign the letter from Kavanaugh's former classmates supporting his nomination.
Doesnt throw him under a bus. In the real word a drunk teenager getting groped is no big deal. Only if he plans on being a republican nominated Supreme Court Justice would it matter?
Spot on. All this shows is some on the Right can be as odious as the Left.
I agree. The fact that K resembles somebody who has a house in the area is hardly convincing.
Garett has plausible deniability ie Ford is a NUTROOT ABORTION-IS-A-SACRAMENT LEAST-WORST-OF-THE-WORST-WAPO-TIPLINE L I A R.
Ed is rightfully f&cking with the agitprop machine, giving Ford/Achoo/DiFi and these narcissist journolists a taste of their own goddamn medicine and eating up some news cycles.
Look, we're just playing with these propagandists now - DiFi is out of the picture (have you noticed that?), she can't afford the NEGATIVE PUBLICITY FROM THIS DUMB STUNTING STUNT.
Absolutely agree.All this does is throw Garret under the bus.
. . . and what happens to him? Is Diane Feinstein gonna clap handcuffs on him? No Federal crime, and the Maryland Statute of limitations must be past since forever. And he wont even need it because even with all the corroboration in this scenario, it doesnt prove that "Fords memory represents anything bad happened before 2012. As you say, its a bogus recovered memory - and one which certainly (if youre trying to prosecute Garret you are admitting) has one of its details - the perp - wrong.I still say that Kavenaugh needs the Hillary Clinton defense technique:
- Anyone with two brain cells connected together knows that there is a vast left-wing conspiracy which has been subverting the reputations of conservative judges at least since Bork.
- There is nowhere near enough to investigate to begin to prove the allegation true or false.
- nobody was killed.
- the prestige of the US government was not compromised by the brutalizing and murder of a US ambassador.
- nobody spent a night in terror and fighting for their lives without support from their U.S. government employer.
- And the putative event is ancient - over 35 year old - history.
- So the natural question for Senator Feinstein is,
What difference, at this point, does it make?