Posted on 09/19/2018 1:40:47 PM PDT by detective
Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina questioned who financed the polygraph test that Christine Blasey Ford reportedly took to corroborate her allegations of sexual assault against Judge Brett Kavanaugh.
“If Ms. Ford really did not want to come forward, never intended to come forward, never planned to come forward, why did she pay for a polygraph in August?” Graham asked Monday on Fox News’s “Hannity.” “And why did she hire a lawyer in August if she never intended to do what she’s doing?”
“And who paid for it?” Graham continued.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Ford took a lie detector test in August.
She sent a letter to Feinstein in July.
She approached the Washington Post with her story in July.
When did Ford's attorney, Soros and Clinton connected Debra Katz begin working with Ford?
Who is paying Blasey Ford's legal bills for Katz and others?
Why did Feinstein review the letter in July, and then do nothing until mid September?
Why did Christina Blasey Ford delete all her contact information and social media posts?
What were Christina Blasey Ford's left wing history and organizations. What activities was she involved in besides marching wearing a pussy hat?
If she truly did not want to come forward in September as Feinstein says, why did she get an attorney, arrange a lie detector test, and contact the Washington Post with her story last summer?
Who paid for it and was it rigged.
Since McCain died, Graham is sounding more like a Republican.
Somebody organized and paid for disrupters at the hearings.
How did those protestors even get into the room? They do not follow rules during hearings and they won’t in the future.
“..Who paid for it and was it rigged....”
And who really knows what the actual questions were that she was asked. And who wrote them??? George Soros??
Basically he’s saying lie detectors don’t work. Otherwise what does it matter who paid for it? But I think every lawyer knows that. That’s why they aren’t admissible in court.
It doesn’t matter, except for deceptive intent. Polygraphy is junk science. I cannot believe anyone here would give it a breath of credibility.
How where and by who a polygraph is administered are very important factors.
Lie detector test not reliable - mostly just for show really
Ask ex-FBI agent and former Feinstein staffer Daniel Jones from the Penn Quarter Group...
That's the truth. It's as if something went to the grave with McCain that set Lindsey Graham free.
Anyone ever watch shows like “Forensic Files”? Seriously- Lie detector tests are no more than 50/50 on being correct. Sometimes I think there accuracy is worse than that. Flip a coin do decide if someone is lying or not. You’d be better off.
What is current cost of a lie-detector test?
These statements by linda maybe the reason this slut is not going to testify. I’m not a fan of his, but credit where credit is due.
were I a judge, I’d throw a polygraph taken by an ‘noted expert’ in clinical psychology and biofeedback so far out of the Courtroom it’d land in the river 3 counties over
I mean, let’s get real, here. The polygraph is a freaking joke.
Wow...what did they do with the real Lindsey? He sounds like a real republican these days.
He was never President Trump's totally antagonistic enemy. It was more that they disagreed on stuff and Graham didn't desert his dying friend. There were stories that Graham was behind Jared and Ivanka being at the funeral. Maybe that hate fest was too much for him.
Pure speculation, but something sure has changed.
Or he’s saying that she wasn’t coming forward unless she had a lie detector test which she managed to manipulate with her alternate facts.
Katz was shoved aside for a power lawyer.
He lie detector test is no longer relevant and will not be mentioned because it was superficial at best. It might be the reason Katz was fired
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.