Skip to comments.
Jill Abramson 'Shudders' to Think of Republicans 'Destroying' Christine Ford
NewsBusters ^
| Mark Finkelstein
Posted on 09/18/2018 7:34:05 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
Jill Abramson: suffering from Anita Hill flashbacks?
The author of the anti-Clarence Thomas book Strange Justice appeared on CNN this morning. Introducing her, Alisyn Camerota said, "you say that you shudder to think what will happen" when Christine Ford is questioned at Monday's scheduled Senate hearing.
Replied Abramson:
"I think that the Republicans, despite all the changes that have happened in the generations since those [Clarence Thomas] hearings, are still going to go in with a strategy to save this nomination at all costs. And if that means destroying, destroying Dr. Ford, I hate to even think about it, but I think it's going to be the same kind of political circus that we saw back in 1991. That's what worries me."
Get the rest of the story and view the video here.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; anitahill; brettkavanaugh; christineford; jillabramson; maga; merchantsoftruth; plagiarism; plagiarist; radicalfeminists; scotus; smearcampaign
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 161-162 next last
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I refuse to call her Dr. She is not an MD. She is a psychologist.
81
posted on
09/18/2018 8:06:16 AM PDT
by
Rummyfan
(In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel.)
To: SkyDancer
Yep. Even if her claims are absolutely true, what makes a person do what she is doing? It’s political.
To: The Sons of Liberty
“Jill Abramson ‘Shudders’ to Think of Republicans ‘Destroying’ Christine Ford”
Play the “Pound Me Too” game, win “Pound Me Too” prizes.
83
posted on
09/18/2018 8:07:48 AM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Proud member of the DWN party. (Deplorable Wing Nut))
To: governsleastgovernsbest
As Anita Hill was destroyed? Destroyed by a succession of cushy academic positions.
84
posted on
09/18/2018 8:07:52 AM PDT
by
Rummyfan
(In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel.)
To: mountainfolk
The problem is the Republican Party. Look at the members of the committee itself, they all scurried to their safe spaces and pleaded with Grassley to delay the vote and give her a hearing. For the most part, none defended Kavanagh.
85
posted on
09/18/2018 8:07:52 AM PDT
by
Reno89519
(No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!y)
To: Rummyfan
That’s a bit silly-—she is STILL a doctor.
.
86
posted on
09/18/2018 8:08:01 AM PDT
by
Mears
To: governsleastgovernsbest
The attitude should be that she is being questioned to determine if her account can be corroborated. It is not necessary to destroy her. If her story cannot be corroborated, that ends it.
87
posted on
09/18/2018 8:08:34 AM PDT
by
Haiku Guy
(ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
They should have scheduled her hearing for after Flynn is sentenced and after they vote to provide full funding for the border wall. It shouldn’t have any bearing on his fitness to be a Supreme Court justice.
To: TigerClaws
“Dems are banking on her as a performer, her credibility, and their ability to manipulate the narrative.”
Psychopaths can be very convincing...they actually believe their delusions.
89
posted on
09/18/2018 8:08:54 AM PDT
by
Bonemaker
(invictus maneo)
To: nikos1121
Tear this left wing nut-job.to pieces
The Democratic party has become an ocean of simple-minded puke.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
...despite all the changes that have happened in the generations since those [Clarence Thomas] hearings...![](http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/2/24/Funny_wtf_cat.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20090211025621)
The Thomas hearings were in 1992. Twenty-six years ago.
Isn't a generation regarded as thirty years?
Ain't no plural about it Jill.
91
posted on
09/18/2018 8:09:33 AM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Get in the Spirit! The Spirit of '76!)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
To Liberals, their ideology is their religion. They will consider nothing that opposes it and all who defend it are always right (and even if they are lying, they are still doing the "right" thing).
To: cuban leaf
Bonus points for “misandry.” ;-)
To: atc23
94
posted on
09/18/2018 8:10:28 AM PDT
by
atc23
(M*NKEY - there, I said it!)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
The destruction of the lying Ford slut is exactly what needs to happen.
95
posted on
09/18/2018 8:12:03 AM PDT
by
Boomer
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Is she saying liberals should have a monopoly on the politics of personal destruction?
96
posted on
09/18/2018 8:12:11 AM PDT
by
Spok
( Findings)
To: SkyDancer
Having admitted to 64 sex partners before age 20 does that to a body..
97
posted on
09/18/2018 8:12:20 AM PDT
by
silverleaf
(A man who kneels for the national anthem doesn't stand for much of anything)
To: A_Former_Democrat
Wheres that pic of Blutos reaction to the flashing of Flounders photo on the Delta basement wall?
98
posted on
09/18/2018 8:12:20 AM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Get in the Spirit! The Spirit of '76!)
To: avital2
i think she can be shredded - in the nicest possible way.
They all need to review Arlen Specter's questioning of Anita Hill.
To: Reno89519
They need to question forward to the public jury, not a court room during or judge.What does this mean?!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 161-162 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson