Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rollo tomasi

rollo tomasi wrote:How do you argue/defend against tax evasion that was plain as day?

Same as any other trial, you purely on a dog and pony show to introduce reasonable doubt to the jury. He didn’t even try.


45 posted on 08/21/2018 1:59:34 PM PDT by CJ Wolf (Free wwg1wga! Woe is media...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: CJ Wolf

“purely” = “put”


49 posted on 08/21/2018 2:03:39 PM PDT by CJ Wolf (Free wwg1wga! Woe is media...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: CJ Wolf
What would be the doubt? A person whose majoring in nursing and taking Accounting 101 as an elective would notice $16 million missing from the balance sheet in there first week of class. The bank fraud is backed by piles of documents. How do you create reasonable doubt against empirical evidence?

“Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, my next witness is Dr. Doubt who will prove that your eyes are lying, reality does not exist, and Manafort is innocent”.

63 posted on 08/21/2018 2:10:58 PM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson