To: marktwain
Nonsense. This policy is only in place to give the FBI maximum latitude to frame anyone for anything they feel is appropriate. They can spend million on a phony dossier, but cannot record interviews? Nonsense. This agency is antiquated and should be uprooted, washed inside out, and replaced. Unfortunately, the new one will be no better than the previous one.
10 posted on
08/11/2018 6:39:19 PM PDT by
Fungi
To: Fungi
Nonsense. This policy is only in place to give the FBI maximum latitude to frame anyone for anything they feel is appropriate. They can spend million on a phony dossier, but cannot record interviews? Nonsense. This agency is antiquated and should be uprooted, washed inside out, and replaced. Unfortunately, the new one will be no better than the previous one. A lot of truth in your post.
The policy gives the FBI control over what is remembered and how it is remembered. It is an extremely powerful tool that puts most of the cards in the FBI's pockets.
But if the new agency will be just as bad, there is no reason to change, is there?
How about we require the FBI to record interviews, maybe wear body cameras?
13 posted on
08/11/2018 6:44:10 PM PDT by
marktwain
(President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
To: Fungi
This policy is only in place to give the FBI maximum latitude to frame anyone for anything they feel is appropriate.
Odd that B L M has not latched on to this topic?
24 posted on
08/11/2018 7:41:17 PM PDT by
DUMBGRUNT
(This Space for Rent)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson