Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: miss marmelstein

Great point!

Her “wolf whistle” claim came at a point in sexual history when if a woman was raped the popular view was that she had been permanently dirtied in some sense;

‘spoiled”

Ergo “wolf whistled”, not raped.


32 posted on 07/12/2018 5:52:53 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: gaijin

His cousin remembered that whistle the rest of his life. Such a sad story.


34 posted on 07/12/2018 5:54:54 AM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: gaijin
Ergo “wolf whistled”, not raped.

Or not "raped" but "she seduced a young black kid and when her husband found out, she claimed she was raped and got the kid killed".

There's no point in conjecture here as to whether Till did anything. Some savage men committed a crime that would make a normal person sick to their stomachs. You can't make a case that Till did anything because of the fact that he was butchered and not allowed to testify.

48 posted on 07/12/2018 6:08:45 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte (Time to get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson