But not one bit less unwarranted, and more supported by the given facts of the matter than the things said about her by other posters on this thread.
Your self very much included, hypocrite.
This woman believed her heirs wished to force her into some home. The story stipulates that she was right. She prepared accordingly. She was cognizant enough not only to arm herself, but to have a backup weapon.
Nothing at all backs up the notion that she was irrational or had any
misconceptions at all.
So.
Unless you can come up with an article which interjects facts not shown here consider yourself JUSTIFIABLY corrected. If (and only if) you find such an article then you can justifiably correct me. I will then deliver a mea culpa because that is what honest people do.
You’re welcome.
The fact she murdered her son is a pretty good indication she was irrational.
You’re making an awfully big deal out of a casual joke about her being difficult not remotely meant to be taken seriously.