Skip to comments.Gun groups want a restraining order against Deerfield's assault weapons ban before..
Posted on 06/03/2018 8:18:16 AM PDT by PROCON
click here to read article
Is it time for SCOTUS to become involved in this important Constitutional issue?
This Ping List is for all things pertaining to the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
Good luck enforcing it.
If the ordinance survives, Deerfield will become a microcosm of what happens with a national ‘assault’ weapons ban.
The ordinance empowers the towns police chief to confiscate the assault weapons of anyone charged under the ordinance. Owners found in violation can be fined up to $1,000 a day, according to the ordinance.
It would be cheaper and infinitely more effective to string the ba$tard$ up.
[[or modify the guns so theyre no longer considered assault weapons.]]
And just what exactly would that entail? Nothing on the guns make them into a true fully automatic assault weapon
[[Owners found in violation can be fined up to $1,000 a day, according to the ordinance.]]
And here we have the real reason for the ban- money money money- as well as turning law abiding citizens into felons who can never own a gun of any kind again in their life if they are caught with an ‘assault’ weapon
It is a sad irony that the ones on this 'board' would not be the first victims of their devilish antiConstitution foolery. Where is MS13 when they could be useful?
“Is it time for SCOTUS to become involved in this important Constitutional issue?”
I believe we need to endure the local assaults on the 2nd and hope we get another SC pick. I do not want THIS SC to hear any of these. The last 2nd case that went the SC went 5-4 and Kennedy was VERY wobbly. We could easily lose the 2nd in this atmosphere.
“Good luck enforcing it.”
Seems to me that unless Illinois is different than most states, it should have a preemption law with respect to firearms that would obviate this town’s ability to promulgate and enforce this nutball “law.”
“If the ordinance survives, Deerfield will become a microcosm of what happens with a national assault weapons ban.”
NYC Philly Chicago Denver LA...All places the inmates are running the Asylums.....
Definition of an assault weapon is????
——NYC Philly Chicago Denver LA...All places the inmates are running the Asylums-—
My view is that the tyrants are busilly running the tyranny
I don't think the city council is smart enough to realize this, but if the 'confiscators' are met with deadly force by gun owners as they apply the law, either 2 things happen. 1) The city backs off and reevaluates their decision. 2) If the gun owners acquiesce and turn-in their weapons, immediately other jurisdictions throughout the country will see this surrender by Deerfield gun owners as an invitation to enact the same ordinance in their communities.
This lawsuit is HUGE, stay tuned.
Like they are going to go to the sheriff and turn in their guns! LMAO! I guess when one of them is caught they can pay the $1000 bucks a day! More LMAO!
Whatever they want it to be.
I wonder how many live in the wilds of deerfield.
Nazism is here alright.
I guess rocks then.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.