Posted on 04/26/2018 6:31:19 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
When Mario Molina won the Nobel Prize in 1995 for his research on CFCs, the award came with a new responsibility: To communicate science and influence policy.
In the mid-1970s, he and a colleague figured out that chemicals called chlorofluorocarbons remained in the atmosphere after being used in things like aerosol cans. Remaining CFCs could lead to ozone depletion.
So they warned policymakers about the dangers of the chemicals.
"We decided it was our job to make sure that society would learn about this issue," he said.
It worked.
Society learned about the problem — and solved it — with an international agreement to ban all CFCs that prevented a hole in the ozone from getting worse.
And now Molina's tackling a new behemoth: Climate change, and how to talk about it.
He's bringing that mission to the Twin Cities this week, along with 2009 laureate Elizabeth Blackburn and 2004 laureate David Gross in a two-day symposium sponsored by 3M and Nobel Media.
At an event Wednesday, hundreds of scientists and students gathered at 3M's headquarters to hear him speak about his work urging international policymakers toward a global agreement on climate change. He was there to witness the culmination of that work, when the Paris climate agreement was signed in 2015.
It's been a challenge, Molina told the crowd: Efforts to address climate change are far more politicized than his earlier work educating people about CFCs.
Fossil fuel companies and others have worked to cast doubt about climate science, he said. They've zeroed in on small elements of uncertainty in the complex science of climate change. Molina described their conclusions about it as a house of cards.
"So if you find one problem, [you] remove a card, [and] it falls apart," he said. "That's not the way science works, and that's not the way climate change works."
Instead, Molina used a different metaphor. The science of climate change, he said, is more like a puzzle.
He projected a picture of a puzzle onto a screen behind him. It was missing a few pieces, but despite that was very clearly a picture of a tiger.
"You can more or less see what's behind that — and it's not a very nice little kitten, OK?"
Sitting in the audience Wednesday was a group of students from Macalester College.
Biology major Jaclyn Kline said Molina's approach to talking about science — with the stories and the metaphors and the visual language — has inspired her to think more about the ways she does the same.
"It was useful to see that take on how to do scientific storytelling to achieve a goal," she said.
And explaining climate science in an accessible way is becoming increasingly crucial. The climate is clearly changing, and it's happening now. The question, Molina said, is this: How bad will it get in the future?
To avoid a climate catastrophe, he said, humans need to increase their efforts to phase out fossil fuels — and, with a little innovation, those efforts might just also be good for the economy.
"If you are sufficiently creative," he said, "you can end up winning."
Molina will speak to hundreds of more students and researchers on Thursday at the University of Minnesota and the Science Museum of Minnesota.
so-called scientist teaches students how to lie to further their careers.
I can save them time.
Hey kids: draw your lines, then plot your points.
What a crock! Biggest junk science lie since DDT! Notice the weasel word "could"!
All of these idiots have flunked chemistry and physics!
Yes, let’s not consider the use of facts and logic.
The question has never been, “is the climate changing?”
Certainly it is changing and has been in a constant state of change since creation. And it has been clearly established these changes are caused by the forces of nature and activity on the surface of the sun.
What is in contention is the influence of human activity on climate change.
>>What a crock! Biggest junk science lie since DDT! Notice the weasel word “could”!<<
Did you notice also that since al gore’s 2005 predictions ALL failed to come true they now conveniently date “predictions” to long after the predictors and their children will be dead?
Yeah the fake “ozone hole” guy from the 1970s. This guy been in the fake “ecological crisis is just around the corner” scam for almost 50 years now
I hope Molina isn’t stuck with tunnel vision. Environmental change is a complex puzzle, not a simplistic turn. Like agenda driven fools want to claim.
In other words, that hole has always been there, any changes are seasonal, and the fact that it's still there, unchanged, is "proof" that outlawing CFCs "stopped" the growth it "could" have had.
They have to be really tricky when they lie.
Global Warming doomsday predictions go back to 1988.
>>Global Warming doomsday predictions go back to 1988.<<
I miss Global Cooling. All those sweaters I stocked up on in the 70s are still in my attic.
bookmark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.