How do you miscalibrate a voting machine except having it count beside one or one.?
Two A votes = one B vote?
Go to paper and indelible ink for a finger. Back to basics.
Start the day with 100+ votes already bagged for the Dim.
I don't know the "how" of miscalibrating the machine; but, I do remember that the exact same problem was happening when Obama ran for re-election.
Is the company that produces these machines still run by George Soros?
I just read over at Instapundit today, that a lot of municipalities are returning to paper ballots. Glenn Reynolds (owner of Instapundit) stated today that he has been recommending exactly that for 15 years.
“How do you miscalibrate a voting machine except having it count beside one or one.?...”
**********************************************************************
It’s calibration of what surface area(s) of the touch screen will translate into a vote for which candidate. If only a small portion of a candidate’s name vote button (typically along one edge) is calibrated to be registered as the opposing candidate’s vote then a small random percentage of voters will hit only that edge. Many voters will not later notice the error. If a voter DOES notice the “error” a precinct judge could simply hit the button squarely and say “see, no problem”. The ‘RATS have this down to a science.
I don’t know anything about these machines. I trust paper ballots with DL plus voter ID scanned and attached to each ballot. Then count each one by one R and one D. I guess that IS too tough.
You misspelled rigged.
The Russkies did it! ;-)
I think they’re referencing touchscreens. Older touchscreens required calibration other wise when you touch it the result is a “click” somewhere else on the screen (as far as the computer is concerned).
It could be that for the total vote number, a fraction is added (floating/decimal) to each non-dem number:
For each REP vote, add .05 to the DEM vote tally...