Skip to comments.Richard Pinedo Pleaded Guilty To Identity Fraud In Connection To Mueller's Russia (Trump)Probe
Posted on 02/16/2018 6:40:48 PM PST by blam
click here to read article
” The indictment says the Russians used PayPal to purchase ads on Facebook which were aimed at stoking political tensions before and after the election. “
How much money did they spend on this? I have heard before that “the Russians” bought $100,000 worth of ads. Hillary spent approximately $1 billion. These “Russians” should be sought after by the corporate world for effective use of ad dollars.
So, someone used a fake identity to buy facebook ads? Has nothing to do with speech or voting at all.
How many billions$ already spent on investigating to indict 13 supposedly “russian” internet trolls!!! LOL LOL LOL
This is a joke!
13, 13, thirteen!!!! whole internet Trolls control the USA elections! LOL
These indictments are a joke!They have nothing on Trump.
But no indictments against the DOJ,FBI, CIA etc for trying to frame Trump, spy on Trump etc.
It is a joke. You’d think they’d be embarrassed.
Sounds like Adam Schiff is leaking once again
What a crackerjack team!
We haven’t seen the likes of this since they collared the nfl jersey counterfeiters.
In what world does that NOT translate into exoneration for Trump?
Is Mueller's position that the Republican campaign colluded to disrupt its own transition?
It's more likely Hillary had a hand in that.
Did anyone in the 0bama campaign knowingly collude with foreign agents in his running for office in 2008?
Oh look. The ridiculous mouse shall have siblings.
One lefty talk show actually believes that Mueller will use threat of trial against the 13 Russians to turn on Trump. Question: Where will these trials be held St. Petersburg or Moscow? Idiots.
I’ve got about $300 bucks in my PayPal account.
Should I pull it out before Mueller goes full retard on them too?
Two words, ‘inflation gate’
It is a stretch to equate the purchase of advertising with trying to “influence” a U.S. election. Usually influence refers to more direct means of trying to steer an outcome in your favor. Such as bribery. Such as blackmail. Such as strong arm tactics to intimidate voters. Such as persuading people to drop out. You can’t have charges of influence without showing how it corrupted a person.
It does not mean purchasing advertising that a person only hopes will get a result. How would you prove that? How would the law decide just who had been influenced?
If it did mean that then people could be charged under the R.I.C.O for placing ads in certain circumstances. But I don’t believe that has ever happened. Does anyone else?
So did Holden McGroyn, Al Kaholik, and Phil McCracken
were any of the 13 indicted part of the group of Russians that zero sent packing just before he left office?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.