To: bitt
So, when is Intel going to manufacture CPU’s that don’t have this flaw and do not require a patch?
To: armourenthusiast
With this much of a micro architecture change, plus it would most likely be a full mask change plus validation time....
I’d say 1.5 years minimum.
It takes almost 6 months for the wafers to come out of fab with modern submicron process.
6 posted on
02/08/2018 1:48:26 PM PST by
Zathras
To: armourenthusiast
When the NSA or Beijing come up with a better back-door.
7 posted on
02/08/2018 1:53:03 PM PST by
epluribus_2
(he had the best mom - ever.)
To: armourenthusiast
So, when is Intel going to manufacture CPUs that dont have this flaw and do not require a patch?
From what I understand of the nature of the problem, it is intrinsic to the architecture of the chips, and removing the vulnerability would make a permanent performance hit. The same intrinsically vulnerable, but performance enhancing design is also found in AMD, ARM and IBM (PowerPC) chips. Maybe an old Itanium or Alpha or MIPS chip would be okay.
No quick fix except maybe for those who are willing to take a BIG performance hit.
9 posted on
02/08/2018 2:01:14 PM PST by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson