Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bitt

So, when is Intel going to manufacture CPU’s that don’t have this flaw and do not require a patch?


3 posted on 02/08/2018 1:38:46 PM PST by armourenthusiast (Trumperific)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: armourenthusiast

With this much of a micro architecture change, plus it would most likely be a full mask change plus validation time....
I’d say 1.5 years minimum.

It takes almost 6 months for the wafers to come out of fab with modern submicron process.


6 posted on 02/08/2018 1:48:26 PM PST by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: armourenthusiast

When the NSA or Beijing come up with a better back-door.


7 posted on 02/08/2018 1:53:03 PM PST by epluribus_2 (he had the best mom - ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: armourenthusiast
So, when is Intel going to manufacture CPU’s that don’t have this flaw and do not require a patch?

From what I understand of the nature of the problem, it is intrinsic to the architecture of the chips, and removing the vulnerability would make a permanent performance hit. The same intrinsically vulnerable, but performance enhancing design is also found in AMD, ARM and IBM (PowerPC) chips. Maybe an old Itanium or Alpha or MIPS chip would be okay.

No quick fix except maybe for those who are willing to take a BIG performance hit.
9 posted on 02/08/2018 2:01:14 PM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson