Posted on 02/05/2018 2:56:30 AM PST by SMGFan
False flag, a Democrat activist PRETENDING to be a Republican, using rhetoric to frame out what the Democrats want people to think Republicans must be like, projecting many of their own prejudices upon this straw man.
Neat little trick in stage managing. And it costs the Democrats virtually nothing. The mainstream media gets to pick this up for the national echo chamber.
I just looked him up in the FEC database. No contributions showing to anyone from Arthur Jones for as far back as the database goes, which is the 1979-1980 cycle.
I hate Illinois Nazis.
..................
Some of the articles mention this former American Nazi Party head has been running for office since the 1970s, including mayor of Wisconsin and Chicago alderman. Unlike Paul Nehlen, a neo-Nazi running as a Republican for Paul Ryan's seat, Arthur Jones will win. And there are plenty of dishonest media outlet who will misrepresent this as somehow something the GOP has control over. As they do with David Duke who ran as a Democrat many times before seeing a opening in a Republican primary, which is open to anyone. Unfortunately there's not much of a Republican Party in Illinois to oppose him.
A perfect example of the return to primitive dynastic rule that democrats want. A large percentage of people would be content to be ruled by a king and his decedents; just like in ancient primitive societies.
The GOP can do with him as they did with Duke. Refuse to support his candidacy, actively work against him. Have DJT publicly denounce him as a rat in the barn. You don’t burn down the whole barn because there’s a rat in it, but you do cast the rat out.
Juan McCain doesn’t seem to care either.
National media never reported it when Fred Phelps ran for office several times as a Democrat.
Meanwhile this story (via other agencies) is being promoted by Fakebook, Yahoo, et al.
McCain hasn’t any brain left. They cut it out and he’s running on the tumor.
As if the Republican would win that district. Ever.
Actually, you’re wrong. The 3rd district was the 5th before 1993 (from 1949-1993) and the 4th before 1949. Lipinski Father and Son have held the seat since 1982. No Republican has won this Congressional district in 114 years when Charles Stuart Wharton got it for a single term in 1904.
A distinction without a difference.
That district is trending Republican at the Presidential level.
There has been one Republican elected in fifty years.
This is probably a district that is solidly Dem, so no serious Rep bothers to run. This same guy has been doing this for years. Non story.
Those districts have been reapportioned. You’re citing Robert Hanrahan from 1972, and he was elected from the pre-1982 3rd, and that’s not the same district the Lipinskis have held. Only a small sliver of the 3rd district of 1972 is in the present day 3rd.
Hanrahan’s 3rd (1972):
https://www.ourcampaigns.com/RaceDetail.html?RaceID=53826
Lipinski’s 3rd (2012-present):
https://www.ourcampaigns.com/ContainerDetail.html?ContainerID=75
Who cares? He has NO chance. The Democrat routinely wins with 75%+ of the vote!
Corbyn can say what he likes. But the dozens of Imams that stand with him -- including 4 linked to Al-Awlaki (Boston, Orlando, Ft. Hood, etc) speak volumes.
Sounds like the RNC dropped the ball.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.