Skip to comments.
NYT: ‘No Single Reason’ Terrorist Attacked In NYC
Daily Caller ^
| 11.2.17
| Anders Hogstrom
Posted on 11/02/2017 10:56:35 AM PDT by ItsOnlyDaryl
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
To: cpdiii
,p>A guess the New York Times does not know how to write the words
RADICAL ISLAMISTmuslim.
It is pure islam. Pure and simple. The real deal. Cut the PC "radical" crap.
To: ItsOnlyDaryl
...even though Saipov yelled Allahu Akbar while being apprehended by police and had a note pledging allegiance to the Islamic State.
Those are the typical symptoms associated with financially and socially deprived individuals and groups. So says the NY Times paper of record on psychiatry.
22
posted on
11/02/2017 11:37:43 AM PDT
by
adorno
To: ItsOnlyDaryl
23
posted on
11/02/2017 11:43:45 AM PDT
by
American in Israel
(A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
To: ItsOnlyDaryl
He did it for social justice.. He and his brothers have been oppressed..
To: ItsOnlyDaryl
He should have parked outside the NYT Building and waited for their Employees to get off work.
Actually, he wouldn’t actually do that because he knows who his Friends are.
25
posted on
11/02/2017 11:47:22 AM PDT
by
Kickass Conservative
( Democracy, two Wolves and one Sheep deciding what's for Dinner.Does the Government)
To: ItsOnlyDaryl
islamic jihad.
I’m not sure why the NYT or anyone that works for it exists.
26
posted on
11/02/2017 11:56:28 AM PDT
by
chris37
(Take a week off racist >;-)
To: ItsOnlyDaryl
The actual times article gets it wrong on at least two points. It claims:
- He came from a family
who practiced traditional islam and never embraced extremism.
How is that possible? What version of the Koran is used in that context? Anyone?
- As with any attack like this, there is no single reason
To say, where one or two or more perps kill innocents and declare doing so in the name of Allah, there is no religious motivation or purpose is to intentionally mislead and befuddle. For what purpose? (In this regard see my new tagline.)
It is amazing that the NYT can publish such articles and yet sell ad space.
27
posted on
11/02/2017 12:07:02 PM PDT
by
frog in a pot
(Those who declare a muslim terrorist to be a lone wolf perpetuate a fraud against us.)
To: ItsOnlyDaryl
Wow thanks Mister lying liberal scumbag we would have thought it was caused by sharia law or something and of course that would have been wrong. Everybody knows the muslim animal attacked innocent people because of Trump’s tax cuts or something right?
28
posted on
11/02/2017 12:32:01 PM PDT
by
jmaroneps37
(Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
To: ItsOnlyDaryl
29
posted on
11/02/2017 12:33:33 PM PDT
by
TTFlyer
To: ItsOnlyDaryl
Some statements are so stupid only a reader of the New York Times would believe them. With apologies to George Orwell.
30
posted on
11/02/2017 1:14:26 PM PDT
by
Timocrat
(Ingnorantia non excusat)
To: ItsOnlyDaryl
I’m advocating for truck control tomorrow.
5.56mm
31
posted on
11/02/2017 1:19:21 PM PDT
by
M Kehoe
To: MeganC
That was pretty good.
5.56mm
32
posted on
11/02/2017 1:23:08 PM PDT
by
M Kehoe
To: ItsOnlyDaryl
“TheNYT attributed his attack more to a lack of opportunity and financial trouble “
I always shout “Allah Akbar!” when I’m broke. Doesn’t everybody?
33
posted on
11/02/2017 1:27:21 PM PDT
by
Rebelbase
(There are only two genders. The rest are mental disorders.)
To: ItsOnlyDaryl
If there was no reason for it, then everything is ok.
Why do leftists defend Islamic murderers?
To: ItsOnlyDaryl
Are the readers of the NYT this stupid? Really?
35
posted on
11/02/2017 1:29:40 PM PDT
by
Chgogal
(Sessions recused himself for shaking an Ambassador's hand. Shameful!)
To: Red Badger
These people MUST have a death wish...........................
They realize odds are they will be writing about the mayhem and someone other's loved ones are the likely victims.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson