Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/13/2017 7:56:57 PM PDT by sparklite2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: sparklite2

Why Republicans can’t get anything done? Because the majority of GOP members are faithless, bought-off, establishment whores ... better described as a-holes.


29 posted on 10/13/2017 9:39:08 PM PDT by JME_FAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2
Why Republicans can’t

One word...compromised.

33 posted on 10/13/2017 10:49:07 PM PDT by VRW Conspirator (Enforce the Law. Build the Wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2

Because they are owned by the same evil that controls the left.


37 posted on 10/14/2017 4:45:48 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists...Socialists...Fascists & AntiFa...Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2
Here's a recent quote about what the Republicans want after Obamacare. It illustrates perfectly why they can't "get anything done".

Reduce costs, reduce taxes, take away the “individual mandate,” but still ensure people that want healthcare have the ability to purchase it

The whole problem, succinctly stated, in one clever, incoherent sentence.

The reason the Republicans can't crack this nut, in fact, the reason their party won't exist as a single party by 2024, is that they are divided and unable to be reconciled over the contradiction so ably stated above.

"Ensure people that want healthcare have the ability to purchase it" Let's break it down.

Nobody "wants" "healthcare" (whatever that is). I suppose the author of the sentence means "health insurance".

People either need health care (meaning, hospitalization, surgery, medications, and nursing services), or they don't. WHEN they need it, they want it (or are too sick to know they do), but when they don't need it, they most certainly don't WANT it.

When people NEED hospitalization, surgery, medications, and nursing services (and notice how much people don't want to think about that - they invented the euphemism "healthcare" to describe it) - when they need it, "having the ability to purchase it" is absolutely, totally, 100% completely the last thing on their minds. So is organizing society so that it will be available. What is on patient's minds at the point of need is death, or life - disability and disfigurement, or recovery. They do not know, or care, who pays, or how.

So, the Democrats have resolved the philosophical question that comes before the practical problem. They want to ensure that "healthcare" (by which they mean services) is given to all by the government without regard for ability to purchase (pay for) it. Whether this is right or wrong, smart or stupid, practical or akin to skittles from unicorns is not my point. My point is that they have resolved the contradiction embedded in "lower costs, lower taxes, no mandate, ensure ability to purchase (pay for it) for 100% of the population". The Democrats know what they want, and they are united and determined to have it.

The poor, stupid Republicans, OTOH, are divided about the underlying premise. They really do want health insurance to be cheaper without the lost revenue being made up by taxes, and they want no requirement to have it, BUT they also want "people that want healthcare" (again, whatever that means) to "have the ability to purchase it".

This is incoherent. If hospitals, surgeons, drug manufacturers and nurses do not get paid for their services, they will no longer be available. Many, many people who NEED (and therefore "want") those services cannot pay 1% of what they cost.

"Ensuring that people that want healthcare have the ability to purchase it" either means cheap insurance that doesn't cover anything OR nationalization of the resources to deliver care to those who cannot, or will not, pay.

There is no middle ground. The Democrats know what they want. The Republicans don't.

As Sun Tzu said, "It is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle."

The Republicans do not have a plan because they do not have a philosophy that can support their opposed goals of more freedom for the well and perfect security for the sick.

38 posted on 10/14/2017 4:51:44 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Single payer is coming. Which kind do you like)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2

The congress is trying to stone wall President Trump’s nationalist agenda. Simple as that. Congress is full of uni-party Free Traitors™.


42 posted on 10/14/2017 5:43:08 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2

I disagree with the premise of this article. The party of diversity has no diversity. They, Democrats, vote in block and the few times they don’t, they bribe dissenters with “Cornhusker Kickbacks, Louisiana Purchases”, and get things done.


45 posted on 10/14/2017 6:29:51 AM PDT by Doche2X2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2

Need more Senate seats.


47 posted on 10/14/2017 8:40:57 PM PDT by Impy (The democrat party is the enemy of your family and civilization itself, forget that at your peril.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson