Posted on 10/10/2017 5:54:44 PM PDT by SMGFan
Link only with title, but other stories did nothave this title explaining the ruling.
What the hell gender is that???
Expect another liberal justice to issue another travel ban in 5....4....3....2....1
All that I found...
“The U.S. Supreme Court has dismissed a challenge to President Trump’s temporary travel ban. According to the Court, “we express no view on the merits.””USA Today
Sorry. Thought I posted to POST #1. Getting old (63)
Trump is making progress, but its inch by inch, due to the unprecedented resistance and sabotage he's enduring at rhe hands of the political establishment and the press.
Relevant issues regarding federal courts including SCOTUS and the 9th Circuit include:
1) Federal courts can and should overturn unconstitutional laws and federal acts but the decision should be based on sound analysis and application of the Constitution as written and originally understood and intended.
2) Other branches AND the states can and should nullify and reject unconstitutional federal court decisions but, again, their notification should be based on sound constitutional analysis and application.
3) The constitution gives both Congress and POTUS investigative powers so either Trump or Congress could investigate the 9th Circuit but IMO, only if probable cause existed for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors”, the Constitutional standard for impeachment and removal (U.S.Const. art. II, sec. 4).
Here, Trump has clear constitutional authority to prevent invasion (art. IV, sec. 4 - the “Guarantee Clause”). Illegal immigration and immigration of our enemies are invasion. Trump’s EO here is NOT a “travel ban”. It would have helped if Trump had cited the Guarantee Clause as the main basis of authority for his EO’s but Trump certainly has constitutional authority to proceed with his EO3 invasion ban regardless of unconstitutional court interference.
I was only speaking of Supreme Court Justices. Thanks for the info.
The only way of removing a Congressman is by his House. Neither of the other branches can do it.
The order had expired. It is now a former order and thus moot, hence the dismissal. Anyone elated or deflated about this has no understanding of what happened, which was a big nothing.
Is that a flaming Hobbit?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.