Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump will urge UN to impose North Korean naval blockade and oil embargo
The Guardian ^ | 09-09-2017 | Julian Borger

Posted on 09/09/2017 1:39:32 PM PDT by NRx

The US will embark on an aggressive effort to tighten North Korea’s isolation on Monday with a call for an oil embargo and a partial naval blockade.

A draft United Nations resolution seen by the Observer would also block textile exports and the hiring of North Korean labour by foreign countries. The American delegation has called for the UN security council to debate the draft, in an attempt to force decisive action following last Sunday’s massive nuclear test of a bomb, Pyongyang’s sixth.

The most striking language in the resolution authorises naval vessels of any UN member state to inspect North Korean ships suspected of carrying banned cargo and to use “all necessary measures to carry out such inspections”. The implications of such a resolution would be far-reaching. Any attempt to board or divert a North Korean vessel could trigger an exchange of fire.

As well as banning any exports of “crude oil, condensates, refined petroleum products, and natural gas liquids” to North Korea, the draft resolution calls for a prohibition on the import of textiles and an end to the hiring of North Korean nationals, on the grounds that the regime uses the foreign currency earned “to support its prohibited nuclear and ballistic missile programmes”.

Both Russia and China employ cheap North Korean labour. In Russia they work in logging camps and construction sites, helping build a new football stadium in St Petersburg that will be used in the World Cup next year.

The US draft measure would also freeze the assets of Kim Jong-un and the top leadership in Pyongyang.

(Excerpt) Read more at theguardian.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blockade; korea; nknukes; nkorea; nksanctions; third100days; trump; trumpasia; trumpnk; trumpun; unitednations; usnavy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
This could get serious... quick. If I lived in or near Seoul I'd be packing right about now (of course I'm already an Irma refugee).
1 posted on 09/09/2017 1:39:32 PM PDT by NRx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NRx

I don’t think the UN will go along with any of this.


2 posted on 09/09/2017 1:43:01 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

But Trump probably thinks this is a box he has to check.


3 posted on 09/09/2017 1:45:37 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NRx
Why not send this guy to negotiate? It worked out well last time, bwa ha ha ha.


4 posted on 09/09/2017 1:50:06 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Trump: Greatest POTUS of all time solely for preventing Satan taking office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRx

With the UN populated with so many dictator governments and human rights violating nations I doubt it’ll happen. If it was Israel, well then ....


5 posted on 09/09/2017 1:52:03 PM PDT by SkyDancer (Notice How Our Symbol Of America Is Brown And White?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
I think they will. We'll see. NO ONE wants Kim to have nukes. He's a nut who could set the world on fire.

If we're lucky, one of his own people will take him out.

6 posted on 09/09/2017 1:56:06 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NRx

It’s brilliant! It puts the ball back in North Korea’s court. If they retaliate militarily, we win because we can finally finish them without being seeing as the nuclear aggressors. If they do not retaliate, we stop them from proliferating nuclear weapons to other countries or terrorist groups, and we also choke them off from the rest of the world. If weapons get out from NK, they will have to pass through China, which will be implicated.


7 posted on 09/09/2017 1:56:17 PM PDT by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
I don’t think the UN will go along with any of this.

Seeing that the current mess is precisely a UN police action in a state of ceasefire, you'd think they'd be right on it.
8 posted on 09/09/2017 1:57:54 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reily

Yes. That’s what I’m thinking. Trump is going thru the UN so he can say he tried it their way.


9 posted on 09/09/2017 1:58:29 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NRx

How much food aid does USA send to North Korea?

The United States has provided $1 million in humanitarian aid to impoverished North Korea during the last year according to the U.S. State Department.

Despite growing tensions between North Korea and Washington, the U.S. sent the assistance last week on the day before President Donald Trump was sworn in and took over the U.S. government.

It marks the first time that the U.S. provided humanitarian assistance to the North since 2011, when it provided relief items including medical supplies to North Korean flood victims. That aid, worth $900,000, was made through Samaritan’s Purse, a U.S.-based humanitarian aid organization.

https://www.quora.com/How-much-food-aid-does-USA-send-to-North-Korea

I’m sure you can read between the lines on both topics here. One, cut off all aid. And two, it was given to a NGO aid based charity to give to NK rather than the federal government giving it to them themselves to hide the fact they did it. Obama and John Kerry gave the aid to UNICEF claiming it is a governmental organization that works with the UN, the day before Trump took office. That’s a lie.

UNICEF is a non-governmental charity that works independently in cooperation with governments and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). UNICEF works to ensure child rights and providing health care, immunizations, nutrition, access to safe water and sanitation services, basic education, protection and emergency relief. They are not a government instrumentality. See the pattern here?

So part of the problem we can place at the feet of Obama in that we are subsidizing people that are threatening us with massive destruction and deaths. But it makes it kinda hard to try to stop ourselves, doesn’t it.

rwood


10 posted on 09/09/2017 2:06:55 PM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

I tend to agree.


11 posted on 09/09/2017 2:07:33 PM PDT by longfellowsmuse (last of the living nomads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

The UN is the only path unless we are attacked.


12 posted on 09/09/2017 2:11:00 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NRx

The UN is all talk and bluster. They drafted 14 letters to Saddam and did nothing more than talk. Cowards talk and then bluster about.

This means that REAL MEN will need to bleed and die, while the UN makes excuses. We have no need for the UN and the cowards they contain. Dump the UNnand do what needs to be done without them. And save the money we waste every year with the UN charade.


13 posted on 09/09/2017 2:13:19 PM PDT by Hodar (A man can fail many times, but he isn't a failure until he begins to blame somebody else.- Burroughs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

The Security Council? China and Russia have veto power. End of story.


14 posted on 09/09/2017 2:15:09 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (“If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

The blockade is the precursor to the final straw because I think the Norks will not be able to help themselves to retaliate. Escalation can happen rapidly. Let’s hope the USN doesn’t have it’s ships run into others,that would be embarrassing or....typical.


15 posted on 09/09/2017 2:18:09 PM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda
Or how about
16 posted on 09/09/2017 2:26:08 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NRx

a blockade is a act of war

so first get a declaration of war from congress


17 posted on 09/09/2017 2:34:31 PM PDT by vooch (America First Drain the Swamp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reily

But Trump probably thinks this is a box he has to check.

>><<

I think it’s a smart move. He is covering all bases and minimizing later criticism that he “didn’t do enough”.


18 posted on 09/09/2017 2:36:31 PM PDT by laplata (Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shanover

The first evidence of any NoKo opposition to the blockade will be numerous ‘lost’ NoKo submarines.


19 posted on 09/09/2017 2:57:36 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda
Carter has his brainchild "the Carter Center'.

It seems he was so convinced his foreign policy was to die for, that the world couldn't get along without more of his sage advice.

When Clinton was faced with a growing call for military action against the North Korean leader in the 09s, Carter suddenly darted off to the rogue state to fix things.

The news of the day DID NOT describe Carter as being sent to North Korean to negotiate on the government's behalf. It was commonly believed that Carter went to North Korea on his own initiative. I still believe this to be true.

After a period of time, the Clinton camp came to reference the trip as a clandestine action taken at Clinton's directive. IMO, this was a face saving move by Clinton, and nothing more.

Carter frittered away a growing call to do something, and enabled North Korea's leadership to proceed to what we now have today.

Along the way Bush and Obama both twiddled their thumbs while North Korea became increasingly a dire threat.

Here we are, thanks to Carter, Clinton, Bush, and Obama.

Now that the adults are in charge again, something WILL be done.

Carter is such an idiot, even his Carter Center members sometimes can't take what the man does.

Side note of interest: 14 Carter Center Members Resign

20 posted on 09/09/2017 3:17:23 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (One man's DACA, is 330 million other men's caca.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson