Replies

the examples you used have a green tint

That's now the second time you've accused me of "us[ing]".."a green tint." After the first accusation, I said I made no such manipulation and told you how you could verify my claim. Now you're back accusing me falsely again, after apparently making no effort to verifying what I said. That's rude, incorrect, and shows poor argumentation skill.

You've wildly conjectured that the SlipNslide(R) changed colour, offering no evidence to substantiate your claim. I here below show two Puentes frames, both without and with the slip and slide. There has been no color manipulation of any kind.

Off to the left in the first image is the port rear baggage pod door and floor that we saw in posts #157 and #173. Everyone else will notice how the colour thereof differs greatly with the SlipNSlide in the lower picture, even though the colouring of the plane, nearby water and its surroundings are essentially the same. Those cannot, therefore, account for the wide colour difference seen between the baggage pod piece in the water and the SlipNSlide.

As to "why [I] bother," be assured it's not all about convincing you. You've already shown you're not interested in getting to the truth of the matter. You're just into seeding doubt, wasting people's time and wanting to marginalize the items under discussion. You're the one that has here introduced the idea of anyone "spending two billion dollars." Those with better reading comprehension skills have already noted that the only $2B mentioned previously was as a cost to have built the submarine, not an expenditure to "get rid of one woman." Yours is a clearly ridiculous summation, one of many we've seen from you in a thread-worn attempt to make your adversaries look kooky. We disown your flame-throwing, literary Molotov cocktails, such as "they were ALL meant to die" and your "newly minted shape shifted cosmetically enhanced Fuddy." Those are what's "obviously not working."

I can reasonably call everyone's attention to the linear video time-stamp difference between the two video frames of post #253. The first (left or upper) frame was recorded at 8:11 and the second (right, or lower) at 7:43 (thus the second one came first). That's ostensibly a mere 28 seconds between the two. Yet, look how far the clouds above the tail have moved (camera faces NE, cloud movement west-to-east). They're a good bit larger in the 28-seconds-later frame, too. How could that be?

We can track many distinctive clouds throughout the scenario, so let me say those clouds do not move particularly fast, except at certain junctures, where they show they've moved "very fast." That reminds me of something my mother told me when I was a teenager. She said, "Babies take 9 months to get here. Except a couple's first baby; sometimes those take just a few months." If you get my mother's and the clouds' drift, there's clearly been video cut out between these frames, despite Puentes' misleading claims of having "just kept on rolling."

Ok, I do believe he kept on rolling throughout. The NTSB simply did by no means distribute all the video Puentes took.

As to "why [I] bother," be assured it's not all about convincing you. You've already shown you're not interested in getting to the truth of the matter. You're just into seeding doubt, wasting people's time and wanting to marginalize the items under discussion. You're the one that has here introduced the idea of anyone "spending two billion dollars." Those with better reading comprehension skills have already noted that the only $2B mentioned previously was as a cost to have built the submarine, not an expenditure to "get rid of one woman." Yours is a clearly ridiculous summation, one of many we've seen from you in a thread-worn attempt to make your adversaries look kooky. We disown your flame-throwing, literary Molotov cocktails, such as "they were ALL meant to die" and your "newly minted shape shifted cosmetically enhanced Fuddy." Those are what's "obviously not working."

Then ask yourself, why do you continue to ping me? It should be obvious to everyone I'm just not buying it. But why worry? I'm just one lone Aussie and my opinion shouldn't matter all that much, should it? I'm continually reminded of Joel Gilbert. On various FR threads it was clearly shown he fabricated details and misidentified various characters. That didn't stop him from being touted as a serious investigator, promoted by James Corsi who swallowed his ridiculous story Dreams From My Real Father based on the identification of a model who posed for exotic magazines in 1958 as Stanley Ann Dunham when she was still in high school and hadn't set foot in Hawaii nor met Frank Marshall Davis. That BS didn't stop Gilbert, he influenced heaven knows how many people that FMD was the father of zero; I'm sure you can convince equally as many that Fuddy was offed by the US Navy.