And what, exactly, does that mean? How does a physician, whose training is *not* the minute molecular level detail of the body's function, and who thus may *not* be able to expertly assess how a drug would work, judge whether a specific treatment is likely to work or not? Especially when there is no empirical evidence to inform that judgment?
A friendly tip. You may as well give up. I do not, and never will, believe you are more qualified to assess and help Charlie than Dr. Michio Hirano. You would be wasting a little of my time and a lot of yours, if you try to persuade me that you the medically superior authority in this case.