Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nextrush

That seems to mean just that he was satisfied by the way the prosecutors had done their jobs, and was specifically not taking sides in the case. Could be wrong, though.


5 posted on 07/12/2017 9:34:59 PM PDT by sourcery (Non Acquiescit: "I do not consent" (Latin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sourcery

It comes out very bad and perhaps his best approach would have been to say “No comment” and kept it “No comment” but he stuck his foot in it by making two comments on the prosecutors and the trials before saying “No comment” and should clear the air at the very least in a very public way.


6 posted on 07/12/2017 9:47:00 PM PDT by Nextrush (Freedom is everybody's business: Remember Pastor Niemoller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: sourcery
Could be wrong, though.

Yo sure could. The most honorable man in the Senate will destroy this Presidency.

9 posted on 07/12/2017 11:00:40 PM PDT by itsahoot (As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson