Posted on 06/30/2017 7:51:22 AM PDT by Lorianne
A country has the right to prevent the world’s Internet users from accessing information, Canada’s highest court ruled on Wednesday.
In a decision that has troubling implications for free expression online, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld a company’s effort to force Google to de-list entire domains and websites from its search index, effectively making them invisible to everyone using Google’s search engine
The case, Google v. Equustek, began when British Columbia-based Equustek Solutions accused Morgan Jack and others, known as the Datalink defendants, of selling counterfeit Equustek routers online. It claimed California-based Google facilitated access to the defendants’ sites. The defendants never appeared in court to challenge the claim, allowing default judgment against them, which meant Equustek effectively won without the court ever considering whether the claim was valid.
A country has the right to prevent the world’s Internet users from accessing information, Canada’s highest court ruled on Wednesday.
In a decision that has troubling implications for free expression online, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld a company’s effort to force Google to de-list entire domains and websites from its search index, effectively making them invisible to everyone using Google’s search engine
The case, Google v. Equustek, began when British Columbia-based Equustek Solutions accused Morgan Jack and others, known as the Datalink defendants, of selling counterfeit Equustek routers online. It claimed California-based Google facilitated access to the defendants’ sites. The defendants never appeared in court to challenge the claim, allowing default judgment against them, which meant Equustek effectively won without the court ever considering whether the claim was valid.
SNIP
Sounds like banning busses because they transported a criminal once...
For example,if you google "Tienanmen Square" in most countries you'll get,among other things,articles about the bloody massacre in 1989.But google it in *China* and all you'll find are articles about how beautiful it is.
Is that the route that Canada will take?
Yes, only Government approved information shall be available to the Proles.
I assume this only applies to capitalist businesses and not to censoring jihadist recruiting sites. /sarc
It sounds here like Google has not intention of acknowledging this court, this case or this order.
Perhaps Canada will establish an agency to oversee this effort. Perhaps call it the Ministry of Truth (MiniTru, for short).
I guess the court isn’t familiar with the origin of the12 days of Christmas to know how effective this will be.
So, can a Non-Canadian, dissatisfied with someone or something on the Internet in their own or some other country, come to Canada, file suit and get it banned or blocked?.....................
There will be no enforcement. What you have to understand is that this arose from a civil matter, not a criminal one. "Enforcement' of civil disputes is up to the parties involved, not law enforcement. Sanctions will be limited to damages assessed against the parties involved. Even if Google gets sanctioned or fined, there are literally hundreds of other search engines where these results will turn up. Then there is the dark web.
Google has become a big, fat, worldwide target. Look at the fines just levied by the Euros on Google.
Maybe so.
Canada is very anti free speech.
Wait until the commies find out there are more than just one search engines.
They already had that.
It was called British Columbia Human Rights Commission and that’s the quasi-court that tried to go after Mark Steyn for his book America Alone.
Canada seems like a nice quiet country but it actually has very totalitarian tendencies.
Canada is going to have a Trump like political swing in it’s next prime minister election.
What arrogance even to think that they have a right to control everyone else’s internet.
I hope not. This is how the globalists are going to achieve dominance-they will just do end-runs around countries like the US, where we still have freedom of speech (at least, comparatively speaking). They will just go nations like Canada which are succumbing to loss of freedom, get court orders which affect global entities and what they do. The entities will eventually find it easier to comply (if they’re not already complicit with the agenda anyway), and this will affect nations like the US.
Google usage at this point is really just a lazy habit. I used to be really impressed with what could befound with google. A few years back they made some changes that have made it decreasingly useful to the point of near uselessness now. Lately Ive found others to be just as good or better at finding relevant results.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.