Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump: Did the Obama administration 'want to hurt Hillary?'
washingtonexaminer.com ^ | 6/24/17 | Daniel Chaitin

Posted on 06/25/2017 6:01:42 AM PDT by ColdOne

President Trump openly questioned on Saturday whether the Obama administration wanted to damage Hillary Clinton's chances in the 2016 election by not immediately reacting to evidence of Russian meddling.

"Obama Administration official said they 'choked' when it came to acting on Russian meddling of election. They didn't want to hurt Hillary?", Trump tweeted Saturday afternoon.

Obama Administration official said they "choked" when it came to acting on Russian meddling of election. They didn't want to hurt Hillary?— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 24, 2017

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 06/25/2017 6:01:42 AM PDT by ColdOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

I think his tweet says the opposite.


2 posted on 06/25/2017 6:03:43 AM PDT by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

you know obambam loves the double cross, I am convinced he never wanted Hill to win


3 posted on 06/25/2017 6:04:40 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
I am convinced he never wanted Hill to win

Agree.

Obamatollah wanted to remain top dog in the DNC/CPUSA party...and only by Hellry losing would that occur.

4 posted on 06/25/2017 6:07:14 AM PDT by newfreep ("If Lyin' Ted was an American citizen, he would be a traitor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Well the Dem party sure wanted to hurt her when they backed Obama. She didn’t catch on then. Some things don’t change.


5 posted on 06/25/2017 6:07:18 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Timing is spot-on:

Gonna be hard for the Zero to respond when he is half way around the world doing his best to enjoy a vacation and meddle in the affairs of another country.    (his specialty)


6 posted on 06/25/2017 6:08:48 AM PDT by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

The Obama clinton crime families are the strongest Muslim allies in the country. This alliance will not be broken unless both families are using up the scratchy rope supply.


7 posted on 06/25/2017 6:13:52 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

That is all a show for the public. Both families are strong allies of the Muslims. Look at their chief advisors—all Muslims.


8 posted on 06/25/2017 6:15:44 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

They’re having a lot fun lately:
1. Did they “choke” or was it sabotage of Hillary?
2. Comey had better hope there are no tapes.
3. Mexican Solar wall (LOL)
4. We fully endorse Nancy Pelosi and hope she stays for many more elections (Spicer)
5. Did you want me to appoint “Poor” people to head the Treasury and negotiate trade?

Of course there is the ongoing pummeling of the FAKE NEWS and the VERY FAKE NEWS and the FAILING NYT.

We are living through the administration of an ALL-TIME GREAT PRESIDENT of the United States!

Enjoy!!


9 posted on 06/25/2017 6:17:34 AM PDT by Disestablishmentarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

“Dere dat BAR ‘gin, Paw ... SHOOT ‘IM, ‘fore he shits ‘gin’ !


10 posted on 06/25/2017 6:19:17 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true, I have no proof, but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

There is absolutely no love between them.


11 posted on 06/25/2017 6:23:13 AM PDT by null and void ( If you thought National Socialism (Nazism) was bad, wait until you see Global Socialism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Disestablishmentarian

-Mexican Solar wall (LOL)-

Ya, electrify that sucker. I love the smell of Fried Mexicans in the morning.....Smells like Victory.


12 posted on 06/25/2017 6:25:22 AM PDT by batterycommander (I learned my Artillery skills from the United States Marines. USNA 65)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Trump turned this one back on the DIMS rather nicely, I think.


13 posted on 06/25/2017 6:25:53 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Rope. Tree. Politician/Journalist. Some assembly required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Seems to me that he’s suggesting that if the Obama regime had acted regarding the “Russian meddling” it would have hurt Hillary. IOW, either the real Russian meddling was on behalf of Hillary or the Obama regime knew that claiming Russian meddling would hurt Hillary.

To be honest, I think the “Russian meddling” was a way to inoculate the dems from potential evidence of their OWN election meddling. The Wisconsin recount ended quickly when dem election fraud was found out. If it had been feasible the dems could have tried to claim it was the Russians who got the illegals to vote. But the illegals all voted for Hillary so the narrative didn’t work.

The dems always accuse their opponent of the very thing that they themselves are doing. Given that Brennan and Clapper hired Dennis Montgomery to download the FL voting database and then upload an altered one in the 2012 election (when dem strategists were saying that the votes in just a few large democrat precincts could decide the election...) AND given that DHS hacked the GA voting database (where they also were so sure that the Trump supporter in the special election was going to lose big)... I wonder if the stories of Russian involvement were so the deep state could do the very election fraud that they suggested Russia might try to do.


14 posted on 06/25/2017 6:33:28 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

I share all your suspicions.

Add to that list setting up a defense (ugh! “narrative”) for their criminal acts of domestic spying against political opponents and their many criminal acts relating to exposure of Classified and Top Secret information.


15 posted on 06/25/2017 6:38:46 AM PDT by Disestablishmentarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

Obama said he was taking the ENTIRE month of Oct off to campaign......not.


16 posted on 06/25/2017 6:42:01 AM PDT by wardamneagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

If Obama says the Russian interjection into 2016 election is the equivalent of 9/11/2001, he failed his 3 AM call by doing nothing. But we already knew that. Maybe this was what he meant when passed to Putin’s agent that he would have more flexibility when he was re-elected - “the fix is in”?


17 posted on 06/25/2017 6:56:15 AM PDT by keepthefaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Disestablishmentarian

Yes, when Seth Rich is revealed as the leaker it will also reveal the whole set-up of the Russia narrative. The ones setting up that story knew it was Seth Rich all along.

That’s probably why they had to have John McCain actually give the faked crap to the intel community. But Comey is neck-deep in all of it; what legit “investigation” would let the DNC keep their server strictly to themselves and investigate it themselves? Withholding evidence - and allowing the possibility for in-house tampering with that evidence - is clearly obstruction of justice.

And as I’ve said before, the very fact that the NSA and CIA have reserved for themselves the CAPABILITY of planting fake digital evidence/fingerprints tells us that they meant to use that capability - which would never be necessary if real evidence was already there. IOW, they have been PLANNING to commit obstruction of justice. That alone NULLIFIES any evidence/fingerprints anybody can find AND disqualifies them from doing any of the investigating since they are automatically suspects in any crime with those “fingerprints”. Their own criminality has made real justice impossible. They have undone their very supposed purpose.

I suggest that the FBI, CIA, and NSA be asked to submit to Congress reasons why they should even be funded any more, now that they have undone the very thing they were supposed to be upholding.


18 posted on 06/25/2017 7:05:20 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

I also want a special prosecutor to investigate who in the US government hacked Sharyl Attkisson’s computer and put classified material on it, and why.


19 posted on 06/25/2017 7:12:05 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Disestablishmentarian

Their “defense” of domestic spying/unmasking fails too; Brennan and Clapper hired Montgomery to do massive spying on folks like Chief Justice Roberts, Joe Arpaio, etc LONG before any Russia narrative came up. But then, Comey told the FBI to keep all Montgomery’s evidence under wraps this whole time...

Again, Comey is neck-deep in the doo-doo.


20 posted on 06/25/2017 7:18:01 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson