Posted on 06/09/2017 1:55:13 PM PDT by Maceman
There was a time, long, long ago, when many people would post articles, here, from WND. Then it became blindingly obvious that that site was worse than useless and everyone would call it w NUT d. :-)
It's also reported that he once refused to answer the door when two representatives of Jehovah's Witness rang his door bell.......He's obviously a Christian hater too.......
With that being said, I don't think there's any truth to the rumor that he fed kittens to his neighbor's pit bull.........
You missed the point.
The questions were aimed at showing the article was devoid of information that implicates Wray in enabling the spread of Sharia.
The questions were written as if standing over the shoulder of the journalist and leading to a conclusion that there is no ‘there’ there in a thesis of Wray as a radical Islamist enabler.
In this context, it should be clear I have very little interest in the answers to the questions. The aim was to destroy the article’s import.
Surely there are CLEAN nominees to be had.
You really can't compare the two things at al,l.
So just WHICH professions should Trump have chosen from, to head the FBI? The Carpenters Union, lawncare guys, dentists, restauranteurs, shipbuilders, dress designers?
And FYI.....nowhere can it be found that Mr. Wray is a "mussle ( SIC ) lover"!
Law enforcement. Simple. You really aren’t worth replying to.
Surely there ARE sane and well informed posters here; you aren’t one of them...n00b.
OK...Again, I ask you:
Please show where he directly represented “wealthy muzzies” himself...
Oh hey...lets get a crossing guard to head the FBI! *snicker*
Do you even know how J. Edgar Hoover became the head of the FBI ?
Overjoyed? Not me. Rudy is way too old to be selected as an FBI director. Look I’m not condemning Trump or even Wray. It’s just that I am making the simple connection between Wray taking money from and making money for Muslim terrorists.
Right. Anyone who disagrees with you, must not be right in the head.
Thank you for the clarification
You may have known your intent but it was not obvious from your post
I’m sorry. I thought you understood the very basics of what a law partnership is all about. But I see you don’t. And I’m very sorry that I don’t have time to explain it to you.
Buh bye.
Not just divorces. Money disagreements and other things
But yes you are correct in the US (and mostly in the NE) the Hasidim use the rabbinical decisions
Did YOU vote for Trump ?
You said, not I; however, in this instance,yes, you are correct.
Why would ask that? Is it because you lost the argument and wish to start a new argument in the hopes you might win it?
Of course I voted for Trunp. So what?
In the other sects of Judaism, Rabbis often act as marriage councilors, psychologists, and/or arbitrators, but that's about it. It is really ONLY the Hasidim who "need" a "git", besides an American bill of divorcement and such.
Even the Hasidim take other Hasidic Jews to American courts of law over money, contracts, and such.
OTOH....Muslims, living in America, follow Sharia Law, ILLEGALLY, re divorce, "honor killing", and a whole bunch of other idiotic crap, contrary to OUR laws. Jews don't!
Since you voted for Trump, then YOU supported and voted for a man who "has blood on his hands".
How so?
He has sold many apartments, in many different buildings, as well as country club/golf memberships to wealthy Muslims, bot here and in other countries. Hey...even in Muslim nations!
I won this argument hours ago; snookums. ;^)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.