From the May 11 article:
The conversation that night in January, Mr. Comey now believes, was a harbinger of his downfall this week as head of the F.B.I., according to two people who have heard his account of the dinner... Mr. Comey described details of his refusal to pledge his loyalty to Mr. Trump to several people close to him on the condition that they not discuss it publicly while he was F.B.I. director. But now that Mr. Comey has been fired, they felt free to discuss it on the condition of anonymity.
No mention of a memo in the article.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.nytimes.com/2017/05/11/us/politics/trump-comey-firing.amp.html
The loyalty question is area that has significance. It is my thinking that the request for Comey’s loyalty was a test of Comey’s reaction. President Trump was testing Comey to see how susceptible he was to doing political favors. The evidence of this came from the way Comey operated as a shield to the Hillary email investigation. Trump wanted to see how Comey worked. Did he have any noble qualities or was he corrupt whose actions were to garner political favor. Was Comey really a Democrat operative who did nothing about the criminal activity of the Obama Regime and the Clinton crime family? Trump was testing Comey to see what baits work for him. It would confirm to him that Comey needs to be fired.
The inquisition that we witnessed today has backfired against these demons of the Swamp.
I’m curious about the 2 unnamed sources for the May, 11th article. If one turns out to be the friend that Comey gave the memos to, then release of the memos and realease of the information in the memos becomes one combined effort,IMO.
Wasn’t there a dust up about reporting the contents without actually seeing the memos?