Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Nothing in the Constitution or federal law establishes any terms or mandate for Supreme Court judges to recuse themselves on any matter. Some few have on occasion, by choice, not that they were required to.

Ethically Ginsburg should recuse herself. Legally she is not required to.


17 posted on 06/05/2017 8:36:09 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Wuli

I would be SHOCKED if she recused herself.

Her vanity and hubris is why Obama didn’t get to pick her successor. I laugh every time I think about it.

That said, there must be some redeeming qualities. Scalia liked her.


18 posted on 06/05/2017 8:47:40 AM PDT by RummyChick (can we switch Don,Jr for Prince Kush and his flak jacket. From Yacht Party to Warzone ready to wear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Wuli

Yeah, that’s pretty exactly what the last sentence I posted from the article says.


19 posted on 06/05/2017 8:52:52 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines (Their side circles the wagons. Our side revs up the bus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson