1) the title of this Leftist "climate" narrative going from "global warming" to "climate change" indicative that nobody knows whether the climate is getting warmer or colder and
2) the absence of clear data of man being the cause of climate change and the % natural causes vs. man-made causes, and the absolute presumption of Leftists like Tapper that the significant % is man-made.
The Left WANTS man-made climate change. Why? Because it will help them get what they're REALLY after: global redistribution of wealth and totalitarian government.
The preposterous and deceptive Left who themselves are deceived.
Keep telling it like it is, Rand!
Jake, did you take any science courses in college?
“...Paul argued that scientists have been predicting disaster for decades, while Tapper disagreed, claiming about the predictions: “all of it has happened.”
OMG!!!!!!!! New York is underwater....
The snow and ice are gone from Kilimanjaro....
The Artic is ice free....
Polar bears are almost extinct...
So Tapper thinks we’re all dead?
Just another redistributionist scheme by those who have been ignoring the limits and protections of liberty provided within the U. S. Constitution!
Can’t believe I’m saying this, but good for Rand.
Look, the climate is definitely changing. Summers are warmer, winters can be warmer or colder. In doing what I do, I see it first hand. Speaking to winemakers in Italy and CA, every single one harvests earlier each year, at higher alcohol levels. So it looks obvious that the climate is warming, right? Yet in this same thought pattern, these same vineyards offer other clues.
In Tuscany, some 1,400 feet above sea level, my friend routinely digs oyster and clam shells from his vineyards. Some of the shells are the size of my head; so you can imagine how long they have been there. At lower altitude - some 450 feet above sea level, another Tuscan winery found a fully intact fossilized whale skeleton.
So where did these oceans go? WHY did they go? And when did they go? Clearly the industrialized revolution and the world population boom hadn’t occurred at the times these examples were placed by nature.
The top 5 “polluters” in the world are 1) China 2) USA 3) India 4)Russia 5)Brazil. After that, it’s Japan, the UK and Germany. Essentially where all the world’s people live. Doesn’t this give a clue? This is where goods are produced for everyone else. Where food is grown for the world.
Are their carbon emissions? Of course! Is the earth warming? Cooling? I think it is, definitely. Is man a part of it? Yes, I think so. The biggest cause or only cause? I don’t see how anyone can definitively say given the relatively simple examples I mention above.
Sorry for the rant. I guess my point is, maybe there’s more pollution and therefore more “warming” simply because there’s more people. Duh.
So let’s get rid of some undesireables. :)
Have a good weekend.
“Global Warming - Climate Change” world biggest hoax and scam.
Just like Obama causing Global Flooding by pissing in the ocean.
That much can humans contribute.
Elaborate scam to screw off taxpayers off their money!
Earth climate and changes are dependent on Sun’s and Sunspots activity supplying 99.99% of energy. Humans can do schit about it.
Volcano eruptions can produce much more distractions to climate than all humans and SUVs farting together.
CO2 is not poison, it is “food” for plants, which in turn produce Oxygen, that we need to breathe.
STOP the scam, jail all the scammers!!!
God bless and protect Mr. Trump!
MAGA!!!!
But he’s hired to make sure they don’t know that.
Thank you for referencing that article Jim 0216. As usual, please note that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.
Garbage in, garbage out.
Computer-based climate models have been doing exactly what the people who program them are paid to make them do imo.
Communitarianism can never lift people up from poverty. They can only bring the rest of us down.
In this interview, Sen. Paul demolished the fake news networks and their mindless statements about discredited, faulty climate models that have massively overestimated future global temperatures. It’s obvious to any objective analyst that the current climate models that are widely used in government and academia have major flaws and need a serious overhaul or even complete replacement.
Jake Tapper goes unarmed to a battle of wits...
That was a pretty good articulation of the points. Well done Rand.
This is wrong, there has been a twenty year pause in the temperature increase, even though carbon dioxide in the atmosphere continues to increase. The temperature had increased recently due to El Nino, but is now settling back down.
that glaciers would shrink...
I don't know if glaciers are retreating or not, I think most are not. But if they are, so what? Not one living thing uses a glacier as a source of food or habitat, they are just big blank spaces on top of the Earth. If they melted, the valleys where they previously existed would be filled in with trees and animals, so that would be a win.
that sea ice would disappear...
We have the same amount of Artic sea ice as in 1940, and more sea ice around Antarctica.
that oceans would rise...
They would rise even if we did nothing. We are coming out of an ice age.
there would be longer and more intense heat waves ...
Longer and more intense heat waves were more common in the first half of the twentieth century than today. Hurricanes are down, tornadoes are down. The climate is changing, but what is happening is extreme hot and cold temperatures are becoming fewer. The climate is getting milder.
