Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The above excerpt is the key excerpt.

Global Times is a Chinese Communist mouthpiece. It puts out their views and policies, threats and plans etc...

The entire editorial takes the tack that the US and China are cooperating on the issue, but the above paragraph is key and directly reflects the title of the editorial, "Boundary line drawn over N Korea nuke issue".

The boundary line is "the Chinese people will not allow their government to remain passive when the armies of the US and South Korea start a war and try to take down the Pyongyang regime".

Can't be more clear.

1 posted on 04/17/2017 5:39:24 PM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
To: ifinnegan

This paragraph also spells it out.

However, cooperative efforts by China and the US will under no circumstance evolve into any kind of military action against North Korea. Beijing will never support or cooperate with Washington when it comes to implementing solutions that involve using military force against Pyongyang. Nor will Beijing support increasing measures from Washington that involve the direct overthrow of the Pyongyang regime.


2 posted on 04/17/2017 5:41:59 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan

The Chinese people won’t allow...? Bwa ha ha ha ha...

This is a government that runs tanks over “the Chinese people.”


3 posted on 04/17/2017 5:42:43 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Happy days are here again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan
China "will not allow?"

China would prefer...

6 posted on 04/17/2017 5:45:10 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan

Oddly unmentioned: South Korea wants unification.

Won’t happen with China intervening.


8 posted on 04/17/2017 5:46:40 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (It's not "white privilege", it's "Puritan work ethic". Behavior begets consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan

The Chinese government needs to pull it’s head out, and come to grips with the reality the United States will not sit idly by and watch North Korea reach the level it can blackmail the U.S., Japan, and other U.S. interests with nuclear weapons.

If the stone age is where China wants to return to, it can be accommodated.

We don’t have to keep propping up the Collective.

We can make stuff at home, and we can abandon China to fall in on itself.


9 posted on 04/17/2017 5:47:02 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Happy days are here again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Click The Pic

13 posted on 04/17/2017 5:52:28 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (MAGA!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan

“Chinese Volunteer Army” Yeah, right!


15 posted on 04/17/2017 5:55:37 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan

16 posted on 04/17/2017 5:55:44 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan
It is a land covered with the blood of Chinese soldiers who bravely fought in the early 1950s.

A lot of American blood was spilled there too while we were spilling Chicom blood.

18 posted on 04/17/2017 5:57:23 PM PDT by 2111USMC (Aim Small Miss Small)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan
Technically, a state of war still exists between the UN and North Korea.The US is the UN's designated custodian of the cease fire and the ongoing negotiations.

Either side could resume hostilities at any time by ending negotiations, but the side that did would suffer the negative public relations of doing so.

So, if President Trump is willing to suffer some negative press reports, he could just wipe North Korea off the map.

19 posted on 04/17/2017 5:58:45 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (America returns to the Rule of Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan
Screw China. If NK goes totally nuke they will invade South Korea and will nuke Japan. Those two countries better be thinking that what China is suggesting is their destruction. And that is not to mention that NK will assist directly Iran in getting their nukes and methods to deliver. The US has only one course, destroy NK now! And this BS that NK will not destroy all it can the sorrowing countries, they will. China is stupid in not allowing NK total destruction.
20 posted on 04/17/2017 5:59:52 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan
Unnamed Chinese Communist source? Global times?

Hey ifinnegan, I was wondering where ya get your news...That pretty much answers that.☺


21 posted on 04/17/2017 6:00:04 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan

China doesn’t “allow” the USA to do anything regarding foreign policy.


23 posted on 04/17/2017 6:01:00 PM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51; Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan; TigerLikesRooster

Ping for TLR.

There it is, official word from the PLA to North Korea and the West. And it argues against every realistic way of stopping North Korea from continuing its nuclear weapons buildup. So Kim Jong Un is notified by the PLA that China will help him to keep his nukes. In diplomacy, China will happily continue with any agreements devised as stalling tactics against the West.

Obviously, the ChiComs want the U.S.A. out of the way of their plans for freer parts of Asia and Europe. We’ll see what Asians and Europeans want: freedom or occupation and enslavement by China, North Korea, Russia, Iran, Syria, etc.


24 posted on 04/17/2017 6:02:57 PM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan

“The Chinese will not let something like that happen”

A Red Line?


27 posted on 04/17/2017 6:07:33 PM PDT by Mr. M.J.B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan

I’ll have to remember, unnamed anonymous Communist Chinese reporters are good to go for FR breaking news section!

lol...


28 posted on 04/17/2017 6:11:19 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan

No big deal. Let China handle the minutia.

We can sit offshore (better money spent than on filth) and just shoot down any crap they launch.

No need for BS.


30 posted on 04/17/2017 6:12:22 PM PDT by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan

It pretty much sounds like a green light for targeted strikes on their nuclear/ballistic missile facilities (with a warning to consider the retaliation against ROK), while drawing a “red line” at invading and toppling the regime. Unfortunately, KJU is insane and his retaliation would probably require the USA/ROK to take out the few large artillery pieces that can reach Seoul, as well as short/medium range missiles if he used those. It could easily escalate further from there. Possibly China will warn KJU to limit the retaliation.


34 posted on 04/17/2017 6:16:35 PM PDT by ETCM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan

Sounds like they would allow a “light blow” but they are warning NK may retaliate. I think we still need more Chicom cooperation.


38 posted on 04/17/2017 6:20:23 PM PDT by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan

Assuming everything we’ve heard about the NK regime is true (to be sure I don’t know if it is) I would say that the best option would be to bait Kim into striking first and then go in as hard as you can from all sides (bring in NATO, Japan and SK) and nuclear weapons should absolutely be on the table at that time. It makes little sense to wait until they’ve perfected the tech to turn their words to action.


40 posted on 04/17/2017 6:22:20 PM PDT by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson