Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Robinson

Methinks that the application for the first FISA warrant was to cover what they were already doing. It was rejected. They continued with their “taps” without the court cover. The second FISA was approved to cover their existing activities IMHO.


8 posted on 03/06/2017 2:24:25 PM PST by abigkahuna (How can you be at two places at once when you are nowhere at all?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: abigkahuna

Considering how the corrupt government deals, you could be exactly right....


11 posted on 03/06/2017 2:27:05 PM PST by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: abigkahuna

Can a fake FISA order be passed off like a BC or selective service doc? How many would have to lie for the admin for that? They have shown over the last 8 years there is NOTHING sacred that can’t be lied about.


62 posted on 03/06/2017 2:52:33 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: abigkahuna

I am inclined to agree with you.

They were already doing what they were asking for in the FISA warrant. They just needed cover. When it got shot down, and they weren’t finding what they thought, and couldn’t PLANT anything without it being noticed, they went back to the FISA court to cover their tracks again.

I have no doubt that they were looking to PLANT evidence, not find any. Since the polls were going their way, they thought they had it in the bag, and there was no reason to plant evidence.


65 posted on 03/06/2017 2:55:31 PM PST by Ouderkirk (To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: abigkahuna

I agree with you. The 1st was to get to Trump. But Bammy is superior to our Constitution. The second was their cover up. They were getting nervous.

From what I understand the 1st FISA was after Trump and outside their jurisdiction. The 2nd was the Soviet stuff that is their jurisdiction.

But once Flynn, an American citizen, showed up in this stuff they needed a normal court warrant. They didn’t do it. A felony. THEN they leaked it. Another felony!

I pray this blows wide open.


73 posted on 03/06/2017 3:00:05 PM PST by lizma2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: abigkahuna

Any body know the time lines for sure? When tapping occurred compared to date fisa warrant issued?


81 posted on 03/06/2017 3:08:47 PM PST by amihow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: abigkahuna

Ding! Ding! We have a winner ...


102 posted on 03/06/2017 3:32:32 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson